Validation of hysteroscopic view in cases of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
- PMID: 16962523
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.05.002
Validation of hysteroscopic view in cases of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding
Abstract
Study objective: To validate hysteroscopic view with histology in cases of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) DESIGN: Retrospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-3).
Setting: University teaching hospitals in Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo, and private office in Rio de Janeiro.
Patients: Four thousand and fifty-four patients with AUB in whom hysteroscopic views were complete and the histologic result was conclusive.
Intervention: Four thousand and fifty-four office hysteroscopies with complete views and conclusive histologic results. The material for histologic examination was obtained through biopsy of the lesion in an outpatient unit or through the resection of the entire lesion in patients who underwent surgery. Histology was considered the "gold standard" and compared with the hysteroscopic view.
Measurements and main results: In the histology of the 4054 examinations, 613 (15.2%) were endometrial hyperplasia, and 105 (2.6%) were endometrial cancer. The most frequent hysteroscopic finding was endometrial polyps (31.2%). In endometrial hyperplasia, the sensitivity of the hysteroscopic view was 56.3% (95% CI 52.2%-60.2%), specificity was 89.1% (95% CI 88.0%-90.1%), positive predictive value (PPV) was 48.0% (95% CI 44.3%-51.7%), negative predictive value (NPV) was 92.0% (95% CI 90.1%-92.9%), and accuracy was 72.7% (95% CI 70.7%-74.7%). Accuracy was defined as the proportion of correct results among the hysteroscopic examinations. In endometrial cancer, the sensitivity of the hysteroscopic view was 80.0% (95% CI 71.1%-87.2%), specificity was 99.5% (95% CI 99.2%-99.7%), PPV was 81.5% (95% CI 72.7%-88.5%), NPV was 99.5% (95% CI 99.2%-99.7%), and accuracy was 89.8% (95% CI, 85.9%-93.6%). In the 814 patients (20.0%) in whom the hysteroscopic view was normal, there were no false negatives for endometrial cancer; however, there were 37 (4.5%) false negatives for endometrial hyperplasia. In the histologic cases of endometrial cancer, 101 (96.2%) hysteroscopic views were compatible with cancer or hyperplasia (80.0% and 16.2%, respectively). Ninety-seven out of 103 hysteroscopic views with cancer findings (94.2%) had histologic diagnosis of cancer or hyperplasia (81.5% and 12.6%, respectively).
Conclusion: It seems that even in face of good validity of hysteroscopic view for endometrial hyperplasia and cancer, histologic study is mandatory in the presence of any lesion as the hysteroscopic view cannot completely replace the histologic study in patients with AUB.
Similar articles
-
Accuracy of hysteroscopic diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia: a retrospective study of 323 patients.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 May-Jun;12(3):247-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.03.006. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005. PMID: 15922983
-
Prevalence of hysteroscopic findings and histologic diagnoses in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding.Fertil Steril. 2008 Jun;89(6):1803-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.05.045. Epub 2007 Sep 24. Fertil Steril. 2008. PMID: 17889860
-
Resectoscopic surgery may be an alternative to hysterectomy in high-risk women with atypical endometrial hyperplasia.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.08.007. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007. PMID: 17218233
-
Hysteroscopy and adenocarcinoma.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;22(3):573-9. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995. PMID: 8524538 Review.
-
Management of abnormal uterine bleeding and the pathology of endometrial hyperplasia.Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007 Dec;34(4):717-37, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2007.09.001. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2007. PMID: 18061866 Review.
Cited by
-
Does experience in hysteroscopy improve accuracy and inter-observer agreement in the management of abnormal uterine bleeding?Surg Endosc. 2016 Dec;30(12):5558-5564. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4928-4. Epub 2016 Apr 29. Surg Endosc. 2016. PMID: 27129547
-
Office Hysteroscopy as a Valid Tool for Diagnosis of Genital Tract Lesions in Females with Intact Hymen.Biomed Res Int. 2019 Nov 11;2019:4074975. doi: 10.1155/2019/4074975. eCollection 2019. Biomed Res Int. 2019. PMID: 31886211 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hysteroscopic biopsy compared with endometrial curettage to assess the preoperative rate of atypical hyperplasia underestimating endometrial carcinoma.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Sep;308(3):971-979. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07060-2. Epub 2023 May 9. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023. PMID: 37160470
-
Multiparametric transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer in post-menopausal bleeding: diagnostic performance of a transvaginal algorithm and reproducibility amongst less experienced observers.Br J Radiol. 2021 Mar 1;94(1119):20201195. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20201195. Epub 2021 Feb 2. Br J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33529055 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Hysteroscopy in Evaluating Postmenopausal Asymptomatic Women with Thickened Endometrium.Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Jan-Mar;7(1):6-9. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_10_17. Epub 2018 Feb 16. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018. PMID: 30254927 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical