Impact of UCSF criteria according to pre- and post-OLT tumor features: analysis of 479 patients listed for HCC with a short waiting time
- PMID: 16964590
- DOI: 10.1002/lt.20884
Impact of UCSF criteria according to pre- and post-OLT tumor features: analysis of 479 patients listed for HCC with a short waiting time
Abstract
Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) indication for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently based on the Milan criteria. The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) recently proposed an expansion of the selection criteria according to tumors characteristics on the explanted liver. This study: 1) assessed the validity of these criteria in an independent large series and 2) tested for the usefulness of these criteria when applied to pre-OLT tumor evaluation. Between 1985 and 1998, 479 patients were listed for liver transplantation (LT) for HCC and 467 were transplanted. According to pre-OLT (imaging at date of listing) or post-OLT (explanted liver) tumor characteristics, patients were retrospectively classified according to both the Milan and UCSF criteria. The 5-yr survival statistics were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Pre-OLT UCSF criteria were analyzed according to an intention-to-treat principle. Based on the pre-OLT evaluation, 279 patients were Milan+, 44 patients were UCSF+ but Milan- (subgroup of patients that might benefit from the expansion), and 145 patients were UCSF- and Milan-. With a short median waiting time of 4 months, 5-yr survival was 60.1 +/- 3.0%, 45.6 +/- 7.8%, and 34.7 +/- 4.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). The 5-yr survival was arithmetically lower in UCSF+ Milan- patients compared to Milan+ but this difference was not significant (P = 0.10). Based on pathological features of the explanted liver, 5-yr survival was 70.4 +/- 3.4%, 63.6 +/- 7.8%, and 34.1 +/- 3.1%, in Milan+ patients (n = 184), UCSF+ Milan- patients (n = 39), and UCSF- Milan- patients (n = 238), respectively (P < 0.001). However, the 5-yr survival did not differ between Milan+ and UCSF+ Milan- patients (P = 0.33). In conclusion, these results show that when applied to pre-OLT evaluation, the UCSF criteria are associated with a 5-yr survival below 50%. Their applicability is therefore limited, despite similar survival rates compared to the Milan criteria, when the explanted liver is taken into account.
Comment in
-
Expanding HCC criteria for liver transplant: the urgent need for prospective, robust data.Liver Transpl. 2006 Dec;12(12):1741-3. doi: 10.1002/lt.20908. Liver Transpl. 2006. PMID: 17133574 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after transplantation: use of a pathological score on explanted livers to predict recurrence.Liver Transpl. 2007 Apr;13(4):543-51. doi: 10.1002/lt.21078. Liver Transpl. 2007. PMID: 17394152
-
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients beyond the Milan but within the UCSF criteria.Eur J Med Res. 2006 Nov 30;11(11):467-70. Eur J Med Res. 2006. PMID: 17182358
-
Liver transplantation outcomes for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a multicenter study.Liver Transpl. 2004 Nov;10(11):1343-54. doi: 10.1002/lt.20311. Liver Transpl. 2004. PMID: 15497158
-
Beyond Milan criteria--chances and risks of expanding transplantation criteria for HCC patients with liver cirrhosis.Clin Transplant. 2009 Dec;23 Suppl 21:49-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01110.x. Clin Transplant. 2009. PMID: 19930317 Review.
-
Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005 Feb;19(1):147-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2004.10.002. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 15757810 Review.
Cited by
-
Milan Criteria and UCSF Criteria: A Preliminary Comparative Study of Liver Transplantation Outcomes in the United States.Int J Hepatol. 2012;2012:253517. doi: 10.1155/2012/253517. Epub 2012 Aug 22. Int J Hepatol. 2012. PMID: 22957260 Free PMC article.
-
Loco-regional therapy in patients with Milan Criteria-compliant hepatocellular carcinoma and short waitlist time to transplant: an outcome analysis.HPB (Oxford). 2012 May;14(5):325-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00453.x. Epub 2012 Mar 27. HPB (Oxford). 2012. PMID: 22487070 Free PMC article.
-
Saudi Association for the Study of Liver diseases and Transplantation practice guidelines on the diagnosis and management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020 Oct;26(Suppl 1):S1-S40. doi: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_477_20. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2020. PMID: 33078723 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison between Milan and UCSF criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan 5;6:11. doi: 10.21037/tgh.2020.01.06. eCollection 2021. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021. PMID: 33409405 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic role of selection criteria for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis.BJS Open. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):zrab130. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrab130. BJS Open. 2022. PMID: 35211739 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical