Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006;11(5):581-9.

Investigation of baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG

Affiliations
  • PMID: 16964826
Comparative Study

Investigation of baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors in HIV-1 subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG

Ana B Abecasis et al. Antivir Ther. 2006.

Abstract

Objective: To compare baseline susceptibility to protease inhibitors among HIV-1 isolates of subtypes C, F, G and CRF02_AG, and to identify polymorphisms that determine the differences in susceptibility.

Methods: A total of 42 samples of drug-naive patients infected with subtypes G (n=19), CRF02_AG (n = 10), F (n = 6) and C (n = 7) were phenotyped and genotyped with the Antivirogram and the ViroSeq 2.0 genotyping system, respectively. A Bayesian network approach was used for a preliminary analysis of the collected data and the dependencies indicated by the network were statistically confirmed.

Results: CRF02_AG samples were found to be more susceptible to nelfinavir and ritonavir than other subtypes. Hypersusceptibility to these drugs was associated with the 70R polymorphism. 37D/S/T was associated with reduced susceptibility to indinavir and 89M with reduced susceptibility to lopinavir. Susceptibility to tipranavir was the lowest among the subtype F samples and the highest for subtype G samples, with samples carrying 57R being more susceptible than samples carrying 57K.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that there are baseline susceptibility differences between subtypes and these differences are due to naturally occurring polymorphisms in these subtypes. The predictive value for phenotype of these polymorphisms was even valid in subtypes where these polymorphisms are less prevalent. Taking into account such polymorphisms should improve current algorithms for interpretation of genotyping results in a subtype-independent way.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources