Key issues in the modes of action and effects of trichloroethylene metabolites for liver and kidney tumorigenesis
- PMID: 16966105
- PMCID: PMC1570066
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.8692
Key issues in the modes of action and effects of trichloroethylene metabolites for liver and kidney tumorigenesis
Abstract
Trichloroethylene (TCE) exposure has been associated with increased risk of liver and kidney cancer in both laboratory animal and epidemiologic studies. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2001 draft TCE risk assessment concluded that it is difficult to determine which TCE metabolites may be responsible for these effects, the key events involved in their modes of action (MOAs) , and the relevance of these MOAs to humans. In this article, which is part of a mini-monograph on key issues in the health risk assessment of TCE, we present a review of recently published scientific literature examining the effects of TCE metabolites in the context of the preceding questions. Studies of the TCE metabolites dichloroacetic acid (DCA) , trichloroacetic acid (TCA) , and chloral hydrate suggest that both DCA and TCA are involved in TCE-induced liver tumorigenesis and that many DCA effects are consistent with conditions that increase the risk of liver cancer in humans. Studies of S-(1,2-dichlorovinyl) -l-cysteine have revealed a number of different possible cell signaling effects that may be related to kidney tumorigenesis at lower concentrations than those leading to cytotoxicity. Recent studies of trichloroethanol exploring an alternative hypothesis for kidney tumorigenesis have failed to establish the formation of formate as a key event for TCE-induced kidney tumors. Overall, although MOAs and key events for TCE-induced liver and kidney tumors have yet to be definitively established, these results support the likelihood that toxicity is due to multiple metabolites through several MOAs, none of which appear to be irrelevant to humans.
Similar articles
-
Key issues in the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonism and cell signaling in trichloroethylene toxicity.Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1464-70. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8693. Environ Health Perspect. 2006. PMID: 16966106 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Trichloroethylene cancer epidemiology: a consideration of select issues.Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1471-8. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8949. Environ Health Perspect. 2006. PMID: 16966107 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Evaluation of the role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) in mouse liver tumor induction by trichloroethylene and metabolites.Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008;38(10):857-75. doi: 10.1080/10408440802209796. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2008. PMID: 18821149 Review.
-
Difficulty of mode of action determination for trichloroethylene: An example of complex interactions of metabolites and other chemical exposures.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008 Mar;49(2):142-54. doi: 10.1002/em.20350. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2008. PMID: 17973308 Review.
-
Comparative analysis of the relationship between trichloroethylene metabolism and tissue-specific toxicity among inbred mouse strains: kidney effects.J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015;78(1):32-49. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2015.958418. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2015. PMID: 25424545 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in workers exposed to chemicals.Hepat Mon. 2012 Oct;12(10 HCC):e5943. doi: 10.5812/hepatmon.5943. Epub 2012 Oct 11. Hepat Mon. 2012. PMID: 23162599 Free PMC article.
-
The Importance of Gender-Related Anticancer Research on Mitochondrial Regulator Sodium Dichloroacetate in Preclinical Studies In Vivo.Cancers (Basel). 2019 Aug 20;11(8):1210. doi: 10.3390/cancers11081210. Cancers (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31434295 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Proteomic identification of carbonylated proteins in the kidney of trichloroethene-exposed MRL+/+ mice.Toxicol Mech Methods. 2014 Jan;24(1):21-30. doi: 10.3109/15376516.2013.843112. Epub 2013 Oct 7. Toxicol Mech Methods. 2014. PMID: 24024666 Free PMC article.
-
Issues in the pharmacokinetics of trichloroethylene and its metabolites.Environ Health Perspect. 2006 Sep;114(9):1450-6. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8691. Environ Health Perspect. 2006. PMID: 16966104 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non‑infective occupational risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma: A review (Review).Mol Med Rep. 2017 Feb;15(2):511-533. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.6046. Epub 2016 Dec 14. Mol Med Rep. 2017. PMID: 28000892 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Adami HO, Chow WH, Nyrene O, Berne C, Linet MS, Ekbom A, et al. Excess risk of primary liver cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;88:1472–1477. - PubMed
-
- Ammini CV, Fernandez-Canon J, Shroads AL, Cornett R, Cheung J, James MO, et al. Pharmacologic or genetic ablation of maleylacetoacetate isomerase increases levels of toxic tyrosine catabolites in rodents. Biochem Pharmacol. 2003;66:2029–2038. - PubMed
-
- Ballestar E, Esteller M. The impact of chromatin in human cancer: linking DNA methylation to gene silencing. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1103–1109. - PubMed
-
- Bannasch P. Pathogenesis of hepatocellular carcinoma: sequential cellular, molecular, and metabolic changes. Prog Liver Dis. 1996;16:161–197. - PubMed
-
- Bannasch P. Hormonal and hormone-like effects eliciting hepatocarcinogenesis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2001;39(suppl 2):28–29. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical