Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep 13:6:118.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-118.

Developing and testing an instrument for identifying performance incentives in the Greek health care sector

Affiliations

Developing and testing an instrument for identifying performance incentives in the Greek health care sector

Victoria Paleologou et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: In the era of cost containment, managers are constantly pursuing increased organizational performance and productivity by aiming at the obvious target, i.e. the workforce. The health care sector, in which production processes are more complicated compared to other industries, is not an exception. In light of recent legislation in Greece in which efficiency improvement and achievement of specific performance targets are identified as undisputable health system goals, the purpose of this study was to develop a reliable and valid instrument for investigating the attitudes of Greek physicians, nurses and administrative personnel towards job-related aspects, and the extent to which these motivate them to improve performance and increase productivity.

Methods: A methodological exploratory design was employed in three phases: a) content development and assessment, which resulted in a 28-item instrument, b) pilot testing (N = 74) and c) field testing (N = 353). Internal consistency reliability was tested via Cronbach's alpha coefficient and factor analysis was used to identify the underlying constructs. Tests of scaling assumptions, according to the Multitrait-Multimethod Matrix, were used to confirm the hypothesized component structure.

Results: Four components, referring to intrinsic individual needs and external job-related aspects, were revealed and explain 59.61% of the variability. They were subsequently labeled: job attributes, remuneration, co-workers and achievement. Nine items not meeting item-scale criteria were removed, resulting in a 19-item instrument. Scale reliability ranged from 0.782 to 0.901 and internal item consistency and discriminant validity criteria were satisfied.

Conclusion: Overall, the instrument appears to be a promising tool for hospital administrations in their attempt to identify job-related factors, which motivate their employees. The psychometric properties were good and warrant administration to a larger sample of employees in the Greek healthcare system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Krueger P, Brazil K, Lohfeld L, Edward HG, Lewis D, Tjam E. Organization specific predictors of job satisfaction: Findings from a Canadian multi-site quality of work life cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:6. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-2-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Spector PE. Measurement of human service staff satisfaction: Development of the Job Satisfaction Survey. Am J Community Psychol. 1985;13:693–713. doi: 10.1007/BF00929796. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Solomon E. Private and public sector managers: An empirical investigation of job characteristics and organizational climate. J Appl Psychol. 1986;71:247–259. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.71.2.247. - DOI
    1. Alshallah S. Job satisfaction and motivation: how do we inspire employees? Radiol Manage. 2004;26:47–51. - PubMed
    1. Dieleman M, Cuong PV, Anh LV, Martineau T. Identifying factors for job motivation of rural health workers in North Viet Nam. Hum Resour Health. 2003;1:10. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-1-10. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources