Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;32(11):1839-44.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0374-4. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care

Affiliations

Validation of the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer in need of intensive care

Márcio Soares et al. Intensive Care Med. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: To validate the SAPS 3 admission prognostic model in patients with cancer admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU).

Design: Cohort study.

Setting: Ten-bed medical-surgical oncologic ICU.

Patients and participants: Nine hundred and fifty-two consecutive patients admitted over a 3-year period.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and results: Data were prospectively collected at admission of ICU. SAPS II and SAPS 3 scores with respective estimated mortality rates were calculated. Discrimination was assessed by area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves and calibration by Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. The mean age was 58.3+/-23.1 years; there were 471 (49%) scheduled surgical, 348 (37%) medical and 133 (14%) emergency surgical patients. ICU and hospital mortality rates were 24.6% and 33.5%, respectively. The mean SAPS 3 and SAPS II scores were 52.3+/-18.5 points and 35.3+/-20.7 points, respectively. All prognostic models showed excellent discrimination (AUROC>or=0.8). The calibration of SAPS II was poor (p<0.001). However, the calibration of standard SAPS 3 and its customized equation for Central and South American (CSA) countries were appropriate (p>0.05). SAPS II and standard SAPS 3 prognostic models tended somewhat to underestimate the observed mortality (SMR>1). However, when the customized equation was used, the estimated mortality was closer to the observed mortality [SMR=0.95 (95% CI=0.84-1.07)]. Similar results were observed when scheduled surgical patients were excluded.

Conclusions: The SAPS 3 admission prognostic model at ICU admission, in particular its customized equation for CSA, was accurate in our cohort of critically ill patients with cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Mar;30(3):430-6 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care. 2005 Aug;9(4):R458-63 - PubMed
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Jan;115(1):92-106 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Jul 1;23(19):4406-13 - PubMed
    1. Radiology. 1982 Apr;143(1):29-36 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources