Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Oct;192(4):538-40.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.06.009.

Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of breast cancer margin assessment method on the rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma

Jane E Méndez et al. Am J Surg. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: We hypothesized that the method of breast cancer margin assessment may be associated with different rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma.

Methods: A total of 178 breast cancer specimens were divided into 2 groups (A and B) based on the margin assessment method used. Rates of positive margins, re-excision, and residual carcinoma at re-excision were compared and analyzed statistically.

Results: At least 1 margin was positive in 64.7% in group A and in 65.2% in group B. At directed re-excision 54% in group A and 51% in group B had residual carcinoma. The lateral margin was positive in 44% in group A compared with 26% in group B (P = .06). The posterior margin was positive in 19% in group A and in 51% in group B (P = .001).

Conclusions: Two different breast cancer specimen margin assessment methods had comparable rates of positive margins and residual carcinoma at re-excision. Different patterns of specific margin positivity suggest that the method of margin assessment may alter results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources