Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;188(22):7966-70.
doi: 10.1128/JB.01266-06. Epub 2006 Sep 15.

Crl facilitates RNA polymerase holoenzyme formation

Affiliations

Crl facilitates RNA polymerase holoenzyme formation

Tamas Gaal et al. J Bacteriol. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

The Escherichia coli Crl protein has been described as a transcriptional coactivator for the stationary-phase sigma factor sigma(S). In a transcription system with highly purified components, we demonstrate that Crl affects transcription not only by the Esigma(S) RNA polymerase holoenzyme but also by Esigma(70) and Esigma(32). Crl increased transcription dramatically but only when the sigma concentration was low and when Crl was added to sigma prior to assembly with the core enzyme. Our results suggest that Crl facilitates holoenzyme formation, the first positive regulator identified with this mechanism of action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
Crl activates transcription when preincubated with σS or σ70 before the addition of core RNAP. (A) Schematic representation of the promoters and transcription terminators on plasmid pBP5. The cc-35con transcript is terminated by the T7 Te terminator, the rrnB P1 and rrnB P2 transcripts are terminated by the rrnB T1T2 terminators, and the RNA-I transcript is terminated by the RNA-I terminator. (B) Transcription in the presence or absence of Crl. Lanes 1, 2, 5, and 6, 16 μM Crl, or buffer as a control, was incubated with 32 nM σS or σ70 in transcription buffer (40 mM Tris-Cl, pH 7.9, 100 mM KCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 100 μg/ml BSA) for 10 min. This mixture was added to an equal volume of 333 nM core RNAP for 10 min, and then 2 μl of this reaction mixture was added to 8 μl transcription buffer containing 200 μM ATP, GTP, CTP, and 10 μM UTP with 1 μCi [α-32P]CTP and the plasmid template. All steps were performed at 22°C. The final concentrations of σ, core RNAP, and Crl in the transcription reaction mixture were therefore 3.2 nM, 33.4 nM, and 1.6 μM, respectively. The reactions were terminated after 15 min and examined on 5.5% polyacrylamide denaturing gels (10). Lanes 3, 4, 7, and 8, holoenzyme was formed by mixing core RNAP with σ70 or σS for 20 min, and then the reaction mixture was diluted into transcription buffer with or without 8 μM Crl for 10 min. Two microliters of this reaction mixture was then used for each 10-μl transcription reaction mixture (as indicated above). The final concentrations of σ, core RNAP, and Crl per reaction were therefore the same as in the above-described reactions. Care was always taken to keep reaction conditions and times of incubation exactly the same when samples were compared in the order-of-addition experiments. High σ and/or Crl concentrations resulted in radioactivity that remained in the sample wells. This may derive from protein aggregation, since it was partially eliminated by heat treatment (5 to 10 min at 95°C). In addition, the responses of additional RNA species migrating more slowly than the test transcripts also suggest that there are effects of Crl on the plasmid-derived RNA-II promoter, on the bla promoter, and/or on termination readthrough products (Fig. 2E and 3A; data not shown). (C) Transcripts were quantified by phosphorimaging and are presented as ratios with or without Crl. Data from two experiments are averaged, and the ranges are shown.
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
Crl activates transcription only at low σ concentrations. Representative gels are shown for illustrative purposes, but each experiment was performed at least three times with very similar results. (A) σS-dependent transcription. Transcription was performed by incubation of Crl (8 μM) with the indicated concentrations of σS before addition to core RNAP (333 nM) for 10 min. Two microliters of this mixture was used in each 10-μl transcription reaction mixture, as for Fig. 1. (B) Quantitation of the data from panel A. (C) σ70-dependent transcription. Transcription was performed by incubation of Crl (8 μM) with the indicated concentrations of σ70 before addition to core RNAP (88 nM) for 10 min. Two microliters of this mixture was used in each 10-μl transcription reaction mixture, as for Fig. 1. (D) Quantitation of the data from panel C. (E) σ32-dependent transcription. Transcription was performed by incubation of Crl (8 μM) with the indicated concentrations of σ32 before addition to core RNAP (333 nM) for 10 min. Two microliters of this mixture was used in each 10-μl transcription reaction mixture. The template was plasmid pJET40, a pUC19 derivative encoding the dnaK P1 promoter as well as the RNA-I promoter (22). A control reaction was performed with Eσ70 (left lane). This holoenzyme produced little or no transcript from the dnaK P1 promoter, and the Eσ32 preparation did not make a transcript corresponding to RNA-I, confirming that Crl affected Eσ32-dependent transcription. (F) Quantitation of the data from panel E.
FIG. 3.
FIG. 3.
Concentration dependence of activation of transcription by Crl. σ (8 nM) and Crl (0 to 16 μM) were incubated for 10 min and added to an equal volume of core RNAP (167 nM). The plasmid template and other components of the transcription reaction mixture were added, and transcripts were measured as described above. A representative gel is shown for each form of the holoenzyme, and the ratio of transcription from the RNA-I promoter in these reactions with or without Crl at different Crl concentrations is quantified below for each gel. (A) σS. (B) σ70. At very high concentrations of Crl, we sometimes observed inhibition of the rrnB P1 promoter. However, we did not observe effects of inactivation of the crl gene on rRNA promoter activity in vivo (data not shown), suggesting that this phenomenon is unlikely to be physiologically relevant.

References

    1. Arnqvist, A., A. Olsen, J. Pfeifer, D. G. Russell, and S. Normark. 1992. The Crl protein activates cryptic genes for curli formation and fibronectin binding in Escherichia coli HB101. Mol. Microbiol. 6:2443-2452. - PubMed
    1. Barker, M. M., T. Gaal, and R. L. Gourse. 2001. Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. II. Models for positive control based on properties of RNAP mutants and competition for RNAP. J. Mol. Biol. 305:689-702. - PubMed
    1. Barker, M. M., T. Gaal, C. A. Josaitis, and R. L. Gourse. 2001. Mechanism of regulation of transcription initiation by ppGpp. I. Effects of ppGpp on transcription initiation in vivo and in vitro. J. Mol. Biol. 305:673-688. - PubMed
    1. Bernardo, L., L. Johansson, D. Solera, E. Skärfstad, and V. Shingler. 2006. The guanosine tetraphosphate (ppGpp) alarmone, DksA and promoter affinity for RNA polymerase in regulation of σ54-dependent transcription. Mol. Microbiol. 60:749-764. - PubMed
    1. Bougdour, A., C. Lelong, and J. Geiselmann. 2004. Crl, a low temperature-induced protein in Escherichia coli that binds directly to the stationary phase sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:19540-19550. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources