Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery
- PMID: 16980709
- DOI: 10.1093/bja/ael250
Non-invasive prediction of fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential predictors of fluid responsiveness obtained during major hepatic surgery. The predictors studied were invasive monitoring of intravascular pressures (radial and pulmonary artery catheter), including direct measurement of respiratory variation in arterial pulse pressure (PPVart), transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), and non-invasive estimates of PPVart from the infrared photoplethysmography waveform from the Finapres (PPVfina) and the pulse oximetry waveform (PPVsat).
Methods: We conducted a prospective study of 54 fluid challenges (250 ml colloid) given for haemodynamic instability in eight patients undergoing hepatic resection. Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI) >or=10%. The following variables were recorded before each fluid challenge: right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery occlusion pressure (PAOP), PPVart, PPVfina, PPVsat, and the TOE-derived variables left ventricular end-diastolic area index (LVEDAI), early/late (E/A) diastolic filling wave ratio, deceleration time of the E wave (MDT) of mitral flow and the systolic fraction of the pulmonary venous flow (SF).
Results: Only PPVfina, PPVart (both P<0.001), PPVsat (P=0.02), LVEDAI and MDT (both P=0.04) were different in responder vs non-responder fluid challenges. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.81 (PPVfina), 0.79 (PPVart), 0.70 (LVEDAI), 0.68 (PPVsat and MDT), 0.63 (RAP), 0.62 (E/A), 0.55 (PAOP) and 0.42 (SF). The areas under the ROC curves for RAP, E/A, PAOP and SF were significantly less than that for PPVfina (P<0.05 in each case). Only PPVart (r=0.59, P=0.0001) and PPVfina (r=0.56, P=0.0001) correlated with the fluid challenge-induced changes in SVI.
Conclusions: PPVart and PPVfina predict fluid responsiveness during major hepatic surgery. This suggests that intraoperative monitoring of fluid responsiveness may be implemented simply and non-invasively.
Comment in
-
Wet, dry or something else?Br J Anaesth. 2006 Dec;97(6):755-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael290. Br J Anaesth. 2006. PMID: 17098724 No abstract available.
-
Fluid responsiveness using non-invasive predictors during major hepatic surgery.Br J Anaesth. 2007 Feb;98(2):272-3; author reply 273-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/ael353. Br J Anaesth. 2007. PMID: 17251218 No abstract available.
-
Predicting fluid responsiveness in theatre.Br J Anaesth. 2007 Apr;98(4):545-6; author reply 546-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem013. Br J Anaesth. 2007. PMID: 17363408 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
