Association of genetic polymorphisms in the base excision repair pathway with lung cancer risk: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer-related death in the developed countries and the overall survival rate has still an extremely poor. Although cigarette smoking is the main cause of lung cancer, not all smokers develop lung cancer, and a fraction of lifelong non-smokers will die from lung cancer. Genetic host factors have recently been implicated to account for some of the observed differences in lung cancer susceptibility. Various DNA alterations can be caused by exposure to environmental and endogenous carcinogens. Most of these alterations, if not repaired, may result in genetic instability, mutagenesis and cell death. DNA repair mechanisms are important for maintaining DNA integrity and preventing carcinogenesis. Recent genetic association studies on lung cancer risk have focused on identifying effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in candidate genes, among which DNA repair genes are increasingly studied. Genetic variations in DNA repair genes are thought to modulate DNA repair capacity and are suggested to be related to lung cancer risk. We identified a sufficient number of epidemiologic studies on lung cancer to conduct a meta-analysis for genetic polymorphisms in nucleotide base repair (BER) pathway, focusing on 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase 1, X-ray cross-complementing group 1 (XRCC1) and apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1. The 399Gln/Gln genotype of the XRCC1 Arg399Gln polymorphism was associated with an increased risk of lung cancer among Asians (OR=1.34, 95% CI=1.16-1.54) but not among Caucasians. Little evidence of associations has been found between other BER genes and lung cancer risk. Considering the data available, it can be conjectured that if there is any risk association between single SNP and lung cancer, this risk increase/decrease will probably be minimal. Advances in identification of new polymorphisms and in high-throughput genotyping techniques will facilitate analysis of multiple genes in multiple DNA repair pathways. Therefore, it is likely that the defining feature of future epidemiologic studies will be the simultaneous analysis of large samples of cases and controls.