Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1990 Sep 11;18(17):5189-96.
doi: 10.1093/nar/18.17.5189.

Differences in editing at homologous sites in messenger RNAs from angiosperm mitochondria

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Differences in editing at homologous sites in messenger RNAs from angiosperm mitochondria

P S Covello et al. Nucleic Acids Res. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Recent work has shown that amino acid sequence comparisons can be used to infer sites of C-to-U RNA editing in plant mitochondrial mRNAs (1). In order to test such predictions further and to search for conserved mRNA structural motifs that might provide insight into the mechanism of recognition of editing sites, the complete sequences of the cytochrome c oxidase subunit II (COXII) mRNAs of wheat, maize and pea were determined by reverse transcriptase sequencing. The results affirm the high reliability of editing predictions based on amino acid sequence alignments, and prompt us to make the further inference that COXI (cytochrome oxidase subunit I) mRNA is extensively edited in dicotyledonous plants but not in monocotyledons. In plant COXII mRNAs, additional non-predicted editing occurs such that the resulting derived amino acid sequences are more similar to those of non-plants than is indicated by the respective plant COXII DNA sequences. A number of homologous sites show differences in editing among species, and certain positions show partial editing within a species. Despite some deviation from expected nucleotide frequencies in the vicinity of editing sites, no extensive conserved primary or secondary structural motifs are apparent. The relevance of these data to the mechanism of RNA editing in plant mitochondria is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. EMBO J. 1990 Jan;9(1):263-9 - PubMed
    1. Cell. 1986 Nov 21;47(4):567-76 - PubMed
    1. Methods Enzymol. 1990;183:318-30 - PubMed
    1. J Biol Chem. 1990 Apr 25;265(12):6811-6 - PubMed
    1. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 May;10(5):2428-31 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data