Is digital intubation an option for emergency physicians in definitive airway management?
- PMID: 16984845
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.03.001
Is digital intubation an option for emergency physicians in definitive airway management?
Abstract
Objectives: This study was designed to determine whether digital intubation is a valid option for definitive airway control by emergency physicians.
Methods: Digital intubation was performed by 18 emergency medicine residents and 4 staff emergency medicine physicians on 6 different cadavers. Placement was confirmed by direct laryngoscopy. The total time for all attempts used, as well as the number of attempts, was recorded. Each participant attempted intubation on all 6 cadavers.
Results: For 5 of the 6 cadavers, successful intubation occurred 90.9% of the time (confidence interval [CI], 85.5%-96.3%) for all participants. The average number of attempts for these 5 cadavers was 1.5 (CI, 1.4-1.7), and the average time required for success or failure was 20.8 seconds (CI, 16.9-24.8). The sixth cadaver developed soft tissue damage and a false passage near the vocal cords resulting in multiple failed attempts.
Conclusions: Although the gold standard for routine endotracheal intubation remains to be direct laryngoscopy, its effectiveness in certain situations may be limited. We believe that digital intubation provides emergency physicians with another option in securing the unprotected airway.
Comment in
-
Digital tracheal intubation: an effective technique that should not be forgotten.Am J Emerg Med. 2007 Jul;25(6):726. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2006.11.045. Am J Emerg Med. 2007. PMID: 17606102 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation.Simul Healthc. 2009 Fall;4(3):160-5. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318197d2e5. Simul Healthc. 2009. PMID: 19680083
-
Developing the skill of endotracheal intubation: implication for emergency medicine.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Feb;56(2):164-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02547.x. Epub 2011 Oct 14. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012. PMID: 22060976
-
The Rusch ViewMax vs Macintosh laryngoscopy in human cadavers: impoved vocal cord visualization?Am J Emerg Med. 2009 Sep;27(7):864-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2008.06.011. Am J Emerg Med. 2009. PMID: 19683119 Clinical Trial.
-
[Indirect laryngoscopy : Alternatives to securing the airway].Anaesthesist. 2010 Feb;59(2):149-61. doi: 10.1007/s00101-009-1656-3. Anaesthesist. 2010. PMID: 20127060 Review. German.
-
[Airtraq optical laryngoscopy].An Sist Sanit Navar. 2009 Jan-Apr;32(1):75-83. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2009. PMID: 19430513 Review. Spanish.
Cited by
-
Ujuzi (Practical Pearl/Perle Pratique).Afr J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):139-140. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Sep 4. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 30456126 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Comparison of direct laryngoscopy and digital intubation with and without bougie assistance in novice learners: A simulation-based study.AEM Educ Train. 2025 May 14;9(3):e70053. doi: 10.1002/aet2.70053. eCollection 2025 Jun. AEM Educ Train. 2025. PMID: 40376008
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources