Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Oct 14;333(7572):779.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.38937.646400.55. Epub 2006 Sep 19.

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study

Multicenter Study

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in predicting curative resection of rectal cancer: prospective observational study

MERCURY Study Group. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of preoperative staging of rectal cancer with magnetic resonance imaging to predict surgical circumferential resection margins.

Design: Prospective observational study of rectal cancers treated by colorectal multidisciplinary teams between January 2002 and October 2003.

Setting: 11 colorectal units in four European countries.

Participants: 408 consecutive patients presenting with all stages of rectal cancer and undergoing magnetic resonance imaging before total mesorectal excision surgery and histopathological assessment of the surgical specimen.

Main outcome measures: Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting a curative resection based on the histological yardstick of presence or absence of tumour at the margins of the specimen.

Results: 354 of the 408 patients had a clear circumferential resection margin (87%, 95% confidence interval 83% to 90%). Specificity for prediction of a clear margin by magnetic resonance imaging was 92% (327/354, 90% to 95%). High resolution scans were technically satisfactory in 93% (379/408). Surgical specimens were histopathologically graded as complete or moderate in 80% (328/408), and the median lymph node harvest was 12 (range 0-49). Magnetic resonance imaging predicted clear margins in 349 patients. At surgery 327 had clear margins (94%, 91% to 96%).

Conclusion: High resolution magnetic resonance imaging accurately predicts whether the surgical resection margins will be clear or affected by tumour. This technique can be reproduced accurately in multiple centres to predict curative resection and warns the multidisciplinary team of potential failure of surgery, thus enabling selection of patients for preoperative treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Recruitment of patients and treatment arms (MRI=magnetic resonance imaging)
Fig 2
Fig 2
Assessment of circumferential resection margins. Oblique axial thin section magnetic resonance imaging and corresponding gross tissue slice. The scan depicts an intermediate signal intensity (grey) upper third rectal tumour (outlined in white). The mesorectal fascia (red line) is shown as a thin low signal intensity (black) line enveloping the mesorectum posteriorly with the peritoneal reflection anteriorly (yellow line). The scan shows a malignant lymph node (blue line) close to the mesorectal fascia. The potential circumferential margin is defined as clear on the scan because this distance is 2 mm. The tissue slice shows the malignant node (arrow) close to the margin with a distance >1 mm. The margin is therefore clear
Fig 3
Fig 3
Involved circumferential resection margin predicted by magnetic resonance imaging. Oblique axial thin section imaging and corresponding gross tissue slice. The scan depicts an intermediate signal intensity (grey) mid-third rectal tumour (outlined in white). The mesorectal fascia is shown as a thin low signal intensity dark line enveloping the mesorectum (red line). The scan shows a tongue of tumour lying against the mesorectal fascia (arrow). The potential circumferential margin is defined as affected on the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging because the distance to the mesorectal fascia is <1 mm. The tissue slice shows tumour affecting the surgical circumferential margin. The margin is therefore affected as predicted by magnetic resonance imaging

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Frykholm G, Pahlman L, Glimelius B. Treatment of local recurrences of rectal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol 1995;34: 185-94. - PubMed
    1. Birbeck KF, Macklin CP, Tiffin NJ, Parsons W, Dixon MF, Mapstone NP, et al. Rates of circumferential resection margin involvement vary between surgeons and predict outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 2002;235: 449-57. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wibe A, Moller B, Norstein J, Carlsen E, Wiig JN, Heald RJ, et al. A national strategic change in treatment policy for rectal cancer—implementation of total mesorectal excision as routine treatment in Norway. A national audit. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45: 857-66. - PubMed
    1. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE, Moran BJ, Heald RJ, Cedemark B. Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 2000;356: 93-6. - PubMed
    1. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rodel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, et al. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351: 1731-40. - PubMed

Publication types