Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2004 Fall;6(4):171-9.

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia

David G Bostwick et al. Rev Urol. 2004 Fall.

Abstract

High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia is considered the most likely precursor of prostatic carcinoma. The only method of detection is biopsy; prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) does not significantly elevate serum prostate-specific antigen concentration and cannot be detected by ultra-sonography. The incidence of PIN in prostate biopsies averages 9% (range, 4%-16%), representing 115,000 new cases of PIN diagnosed each year in United States. PIN has a high predictive value as a marker for adenocarcinoma, and its identification warrants repeated biopsy for concurrent or subsequent invasive carcinoma. Carcinoma will develop in most patients with PIN within 10 years. PIN is associated with progressive abnormalities of phenotype and genotype that are intermediate between normal prostatic epithelium and cancer, indicating impairment of cell differentiation and regulatory control with advancing stages of prostatic carcinogenesis. Androgen deprivation therapy decreases the prevalence and extent of PIN, suggesting that this form of treatment may play a role in chemoprevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, tufting pattern (hematoxylin & eosin, × 400).
Figure 2
Figure 2
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, micropapillary pattern (hematoxylin & eosin, × 400).)
Figure 3
Figure 3
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, cribiform pattern (hematoxylin & eosin, × 200).)
Figure 4
Figure 4
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, flat pattern (hematoxylin & eosin, × 200).)
Figure 5
Figure 5
Historical biopsy approaches (left) could easily miss invasive cancer (gray) because of undersampling. In modern biopsy approaches (right), with multiple cores being taken, it is unlikely that a concomitant carcinoma in the face of PIN (yellow) will be missed. PIN, prosatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

References

    1. Argani P, Epstein JI. Inverted (Hobnail) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN): report of 15 cases of a previously undescribed pattern of high-grade PIN. Am J Surg Pathol. 2001;25:1534–1539. - PubMed
    1. Epstein JI, Carmichael M, Partin AW. OA-519 (fatty acid synthase) as an independent predictor of pathologic state in adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Urology. 1995;45:81–86. - PubMed
    1. Jenkins RB, Qian J, Lieber MM, Bostwick DG. Detection of c-myc oncogene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Res. 1997;57:524–531. - PubMed
    1. Sakr WA, Sarkar FH, Sreepathi P, et al. Measurement of cellular proliferation in human prostate by AgNOR, PCNA, and SPF. Prostate. 1993;22:147–154. - PubMed
    1. Hiroi H, Inoue S, Watanabe T, et al. Differential immunolocalization of estrogen receptor alpha and beta in rat ovary and uterus. J Mol Endocrinol. 1999;22:37–44. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources