Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy
- PMID: 16985599
- PMCID: PMC1472843
Evaluation and surgical management of intrinsic sphincter deficiency after radical prostatectomy
Abstract
Urinary incontinence following prostatectomy is usually due to intrinsic sphincter deficiency and is often referred to as post-prostatectomy incontinence (PPI). The male sling is an effective minimally invasive procedure for low volume PPI. Although the male sling procedure is becoming increasingly popular, the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) remains the gold standard. Placement of the AUS cuff using the transcorporal technique salvages patients with urethral atrophy as well as prior AUS erosion or infection. As the surgical options for PPI expand, it is important to analyze the outcomes with contemporary surgical techniques and to develop an algorithm for procedure selection.
Figures
References
-
- Litwin MS, Hays RD, Fink A, et al. Quality-of-life outcomes in men treated for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1995;273:129–135. - PubMed
-
- Ficazolla MA, Nitti VW. The etiology of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence and correlation of symptoms with urodynamic findings. J Urol. 1998;160:1317–1320. - PubMed
-
- Peyromaure M, Ravery V, Boccon-Gibod LB. The management of stress urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2002;90:155–161. - PubMed
-
- Perez LM, Webster GD. Successful outcome of artificial urinary sphincters in men with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence despite adverse implantation features. J Urol. 1992;148:1166–1170. - PubMed
-
- Kuznetsov DD, Kim HL, Patel RV, et al. Comparison of the artificial urinary sphincter and collagen for the treatment of postprostatectomy incontinence. Urology. 2000;56:600–603. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials