Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2002 Summer;4(3):141-6.

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy

Robert Meier et al. Rev Urol. 2002 Summer.

Abstract

Prostate cancers that clinically appear to be localized may nonetheless respond poorly to curative treatment. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score, and percentage of positive biopsies are all at least as important as clinical stage in predicting treatment outcome. A patient with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum PSA of 12 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 in 2 of 12 biopsy cores has a relatively poor prognosis. In a high-risk patient such as this one, the recommended treatment strategy involves a combination of brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy. In studies comparing treatments in patients stratified according to a variety of risk measures, this combination has shown biochemical disease-free survival rates superior to those seen following radical prostatectomy. The role of androgen suppression remains unclear.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Pretreatment nomogram for prostate-specific antigen recurrence after radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:168–172. - PubMed
    1. D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. Utilizing predictions of early prostate-specific antigen failure to optimize patient selection for adjuvant systemic therapy trials. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18:3240–3246. - PubMed
    1. Partin A, Piantadosi S, Sanda M, et al. Selection of men at high risk for disease recurrence for experimental adjuvant therapy following radical prostatectomy. Urology. 1995;45:831–838. - PubMed
    1. Lerner SE, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, et al. Analysis of risk factors for progression in patients with pathologically confined prostate cancers after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol. 1996;156:137–143. - PubMed
    1. Zietman AL, Edelstein RA, Coen JJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: the influence of preoperative and pathological findings on biochemical disease-free outcome. J Urol. 1994;43:828–833. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources