Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2006 Oct;20(9):1070-5.
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.01702.x.

Electro-optical synergy (ELOS) technology for nonablative skin rejuvenation: a preliminary prospective study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Electro-optical synergy (ELOS) technology for nonablative skin rejuvenation: a preliminary prospective study

S Hammes et al. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background and objectives: In this preliminary prospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of nonablative wrinkle treatment using combined radiofrequency (RF) and optical energy (Polaris). The dual energy technology of Polaris, called ELOS, which stands for electro-optical synergy, uses synchronous pulses of bipolar RF current and pulsed visible light (diode laser) delivered in the same pulse.

Materials and methods: Twenty-four subjects with periorbital and perioral wrinkles received six treatments at 4-week intervals with the Polaris WR (Syneron, Inc., Israel, 900 nm, max. RF energy 100 J/cm(3), max. laser energy 50 J/cm(2)). Each treatment consisted of two passes over the treatment area using pulsed optical and RF parameters that were determined by the patient's skin phenotype and distribution of target chromophores. The follow-up period was 3 months after the last treatment.

Results: Independent scoring of blinded photographs showed a wrinkle score improvement of at least 1 (0 = no improvement, 1 = medium, 2 = good, 3 = excellent improvement) 3 months after the last of six treatment sessions. There was no difference between periorbital and perioral wrinkle reduction. Fifty-eight per cent (14/24) of the subjects reported a notable wrinkle reduction; 16% noted mild to moderate oedema and erythema lasting for no more than 1 day. Scarring or pigmentary changes were not detected. The average pain score was 0.6 (0 = no pain, 5 = intolerable pain).

Conclusion: Multiple treatments with the Polaris WR produced objective and subjective reduction of periorbital and perioral wrinkles. The occurrence of side-effects and pain was very low. The clinical effect may be caused by matrix coagulation of the deep dermis by the RF and selective thermolysis of blood vessels with the 900 nm diode laser.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources