Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Oct;74(10):5820-5.
doi: 10.1128/IAI.00331-06.

Comparison of protective efficacy of subcutaneous versus intranasal immunization of mice with a Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide subunit vaccine

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of protective efficacy of subcutaneous versus intranasal immunization of mice with a Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide subunit vaccine

Apurba K Bhattacharjee et al. Infect Immun. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Groups of mice were immunized either subcutaneously or intranasally with purified Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or with LPS as a noncovalent complex with Neisseria meningitidis group B outer membrane protein (LPS-GBOMP). Control mice were inoculated with sterile saline. Two doses of vaccine were given 4 weeks apart. Mice were challenged intranasally with virulent B. melitensis strain 16M 4 weeks after the second dose of vaccine. Sera, spleens, lungs, and livers of mice were harvested 8 weeks after challenge. The bacterial loads in the organs were determined by culture on brucella agar plates. Protective efficacy was determined by comparing the clearance of bacteria from organs of immunized mice with the clearance of bacteria from organs of control mice. At 8 weeks postchallenge there was significant protection from disseminated infection of spleens and livers of mice intranasally immunized with either vaccine compared to infection of control mice (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in clearance of bacteria from the lungs of immunized mice and control mice. However, mice immunized subcutaneously with either LPS or LPS-GBOMP vaccine showed significant protection against infection of the spleen (P < 0.001), liver (P < 0.001), and lungs (P < 0.05). These results show that intranasal immunization of mice with either vaccine provided significant protection against disseminated infection of the spleen and liver but subcutaneous immunization of mice with the vaccines conferred significant protection against infection of the spleen, liver, and lungs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Al-Mariri, A., A. Tibor, P. Mertens, X. D. Bolle, P. Mitchel, J. Godefroid, K. Walravens, and J. J. Letesson. 2001. Protection of BALB/c mice against Brucella abortus 544 challenge by vaccination with bacterioferritin or P39 recombinant protein with CpG oligodeoxynucleotide as adjuvant. Infect. Immun. 69:4816-4822. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bhattacharjee, A. K., L. L. Van De Verg, M. J. Izadjoo, L. Yuan, T. L. Hadfield, W. D. Zollinger, and D. L. Hoover. 2002. Protection of mice against brucellosis by intranasal immunization with Brucella melitensis lipopolysaccharide as a non-covalent complex with Neisseria meningitidis group B outer membrane protein. Infect. Immun. 70:3324-3329. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blasco, J. M., and R. Diaz. 1993. Brucella melitensis Rev-1 vaccine as a cause of human brucellosis. Lancet 342:805. - PubMed
    1. Boslego, J., J. Garcia, C. Cruz, W. Zollinger, B. Brandt, S. Ruiz, M. Martinez, J. Arthur, P. Underwood, W. Silva, et al. 1995. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of a meningococcal group B (15:P1.3) outer membrane protein vaccine in Iquique Chile. Chilean National Committee for Meningococcal Disease. Vaccine 13:821-829. - PubMed
    1. Bundle, D. R., J. W. Cherwonogrodzky, and M. Perry. 1987. Structural elucidation of the Brucella melitensis M antigen by high resolution NMR at 500 MHz. Biochemistry 26:8717-8726. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms