Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep;16(9):1198-204.
doi: 10.1381/096089206778392194.

Pre-surgery binge eating status: effect on eating behavior and weight outcome after gastric bypass

Lindsey E Bocchieri-Ricciardi  1 , Eunice Y Chen, Daniel Munoz, Sarah Fischer, Maureen Dymek-Valentine, John C Alverdy, Daniel le Grange
Affiliations

Pre-surgery binge eating status: effect on eating behavior and weight outcome after gastric bypass

Lindsey E Bocchieri-Ricciardi et al. Obes Surg. 2006 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The impact of pre-surgical binge eating on postoperative outcomes is poorly understood. Previous studies have found marked preoperative differences between binge eaters (BE) and non-binge eaters (NBE) in hunger and disinhibition using the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ). Short-term prospective data are mixed regarding whether these differences persist after surgery and if preoperative binge eating impacts postoperative weight outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to compare self-reported eating behavior and weight outcomes between BE and NBE after the first postoperative year.

Methods: Prior to surgery, 72 Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) patients completed the Questionnaire of Eating and Weight Patterns (QEWP) or QEWP-Revised (QEWP-R), to assess binge eating status which was defined as one objective binge episode per week over the past 6 months. Subjects also completed the TFEQ prior to surgery and again > or = 12 months after surgery.

Results: For BE, higher scores were found for both hunger and disinhibition prior to surgery. At a mean of 18 months after surgery, BE and NBE were indistinguishable on these subscales and there were no differences in weight lost.

Conclusions: RYGBP surgery has an equally positive impact on eating behavior and weight loss for both BE and NBE. Within a multidisciplinary clinic, preoperative BE status does not appear to be a negative prognostic indicator for RYGBP surgery in the domains of weight loss and disinhibition. Further replication is needed with longer follow-up times and larger samples.

PubMed Disclaimer