Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1967 Mar;189(1):163-76.
doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1967.sp008161.

Current spread in the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig vas deferens

Current spread in the smooth muscle of the guinea-pig vas deferens

T Tomita. J Physiol. 1967 Mar.

Abstract

1. The membrane polarization in response to intracellular stimulation and external stimulation, the junction potentials evoked by nerve and field stimulation and the spontaneous junction potentials were studied in the guinea-pig vas deferens.2. The responses to intracellular stimulation differed from those to external stimulation applied through a large electrode in the following ways: short time constant of the electrotonic potential; linearity of current-voltage relation; all-or-none spike only in a small proportion of the cells; high critical firing level; short latency; weak tendency for repetitive activity during depolarization; and sharp spatial decay of the response.3. The difference between intracellular and external stimulation could be explained by differences in current distribution in the tissue, if many muscle fibres were aggregated in functional bundles, with three-dimensional cell-to-cell connexions, so that the membrane near an intracellular stimulating electrode was shunted by a large area of surrounding membrane.4. The time course of the junction potentials depended on the manner by which they were produced. The junction potential evoked by hypogastric nerve stimulation was recorded in every cell with almost the same amplitude. The spontaneous junction potential decayed very sharply with distance and the time course of the falling phase was about 10 times faster than that of the evoked junction potential.The difference between the time course of the junction potentials was also explained by the difference in current distribution in the tissue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1958 Jan 1;148(930):38-56 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1956 Jun 28;132(3):586-98 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1960 Sep 10;187:951-2 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1961 Jan;155:115-33 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1961 Mar;155:514-29 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources