Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Aug;6(3):78-83.
doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2006.3150.

Two-criteria dental aging method applied to a Bosnian population: comparison of formulae for each tooth group versus one formula for all teeth

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Two-criteria dental aging method applied to a Bosnian population: comparison of formulae for each tooth group versus one formula for all teeth

Nermin Sarajlić et al. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2006 Aug.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain age estimation formulae using the length of periodontosis, transparency of the root and root height in each tooth group for the current male population in Bosnia and Herzegovina and to compare these formulae with Lamendin's and Prince's formulae. The research was undertaken on 847 single rooted teeth from 200 identified deceased persons, individuals who died between the ages of 23 and 85 years. Periodontosis, transparency and root height were measured according to Lamendin's procedure. All teeth were grouped in two ways: according to the tooth groups and to the age groups. The highest coefficients of correlation are obtained for maxillary canines (R = 0,731) and mandibular canines (R = 0,706) and the maxillary lateral incisors showed the lowest mean error (ME = 6,63 years). In age groups, the lowest mean error was obtained in the 40-49 years age group (ME = 5,15 years). Equations developed in this study give statistically significantly better age estimations in comparison to the original Lamendin and Prince formulae for the whole sample as well as for each tooth group, except for mandibular central incisors. Age estimation with models developed for each tooth group (except for mandibular lateral incisors) was statistically significantly better than models based on the whole sample.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gustafson G. Age determination on teeth. J. Am. Dent. Assoc. 1950;41:45–54. - PubMed
    1. Lamendin H, Baccino E, Humbert JF, Tavernier JC, Nossin-tchouk RM, Zerilli A. A simple technique for age determination in adult corpse: the two criteria dental method. J. Forensic Sci. 1992;37:1373–1379. - PubMed
    1. Soomer H, Ranta H, Lincoln MJ, Penttilä A, Leibur E. Reliability and validity of eight dental age estimation methods for adults. J. Forensic Sci. 2003;48:149–152. - PubMed
    1. Baccino E, Ubelaker DH, Hayek LA, Zerilli A. Evaluation of seven methods of estimating age at death from mature human skeletal remains. J. Forensic Sci. 1999;44:931–936. - PubMed
    1. Prince D, Ubelaker DH. Application of Lamendin’s adult dental aging technique to a diverese skeletal sample. J. Forensic Sci. 2002;47:107–116. - PubMed

Publication types