Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model
- PMID: 16996354
- DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.060
Comparison of Pelican single-use multibite biopsy forceps and traditional double-bite forceps: evaluation in a porcine model
Abstract
Background: The multibite biopsy forceps is intended for consecutive acquisition of numerous tissue specimens with a single pass. The Pelican multibite forceps is equipped with a sleeve for tissue retention that allows up to 6 specimens to be obtained with each pass of the device through the accessory channel. Reducing the need for device exchange could decrease the total procedure time for colon cancer surveillance in patients with longstanding inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate a new multibite biopsy forceps in comparison with a standard double-bite forceps.
Design: Prospective randomized animal model trial.
Setting: Multicenter university and community hospitals.
Interventions: By using a live porcine model, multiple colonoscopic biopsy specimens were obtained with both the Pelican multibite forceps and the Radial Jaw 3 (RJ3) double-bite forceps to mimic colorectal cancer surveillance in patients with IBD. Six biopsy specimens were obtained with each of 6 passes when using the Pelican forceps, and 2 biopsy specimens were obtained with each of 18 passes when using the RJ3 forceps.
Main outcome measurements: All trials were timed. Two independent pathologists blinded to the forceps used evaluated the specimens.
Results: Tissue acquisition when using the Pelican multibite forceps was significantly faster than with a standard double-bite forceps. The devices compared equivalently for specimen retention and quality.
Limitations: The operator could not be blinded to the devices used. This study uses an animal model to extrapolate how the devices might perform in human use.
Conclusions: These findings support the evaluation of the Pelican forceps for colon cancer surveillance in patients with longstanding IBD.
Similar articles
-
Jumbo forceps are superior to standard large-capacity forceps in obtaining diagnostically adequate inflammatory bowel disease surveillance biopsy specimens.Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Aug;68(2):273-8; quiz 334, 336. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.11.023. Epub 2007 Dec 26. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008. PMID: 18155204
-
A prospective comparison of performance of biopsy forceps used in single passage with multiple bites during upper endoscopy.Endoscopy. 2003 Apr;35(4):338-42. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-38147. Endoscopy. 2003. PMID: 12664392
-
Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):600-4. doi: 10.1067/mge.2001.118945. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001. PMID: 11677476 Clinical Trial.
-
Biopsy forceps: reusable or disposable?J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006 Jul;21(7):1089-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.04429.x. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006. PMID: 16824057 Review.
-
High-magnification colonoscopy (with videos).Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Oct;64(4):604-13. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2006.06.007. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16996357 Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical