Evaluation of two methods for generating cRNA for microarray experiments from nanogram amounts of total RNA
- PMID: 16996470
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.08.023
Evaluation of two methods for generating cRNA for microarray experiments from nanogram amounts of total RNA
Abstract
Several methods have been developed for amplification of RNA, making it possible to use cDNA microarrays for analysis of samples limited in amount of total RNA. The most widely used amplification protocol, the Eberwine method, amplifies RNA in a linear manner through in vitro transcription (IVT). However, when starting material is limited to nanogram amounts of total RNA, several rounds of amplification are necessary, making this method both expensive and labor-intensive. Amplification by PCR is robust and is able to amplify extremely limiting material. However, it is possible that the nonlinear nature of PCR could result in reduced reproducibility of the amplification compared with IVT. We have evaluated two methods that use a combination of PCR and IVT for amplification of nanogram amounts of total RNA. We have compared microarray results obtained by these methods with results obtained by two established methods: indirect labeling of 20 microg total RNA and Eberwine amplification of 1 microg total RNA. Starting from as little as 5 ng of total RNA, both methods yielded results in concordance with the Eberwine method.
Similar articles
-
An alternative method to amplify RNA without loss of signal conservation for expression analysis with a proteinase DNA microarray in the ArrayTube format.BMC Genomics. 2006 Jun 12;7:144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-144. BMC Genomics. 2006. PMID: 16768788 Free PMC article.
-
Application of amplified RNA and evaluation of cRNA targets for spotted-oligonucleotide microarray.Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Dec 24;325(4):1346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.10.151. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004. PMID: 15555575
-
Comparative analysis of a 3' end tag PCR and a linear RNA amplification approach for microarray analysis.J Biotechnol. 2007 Jan 20;127(4):638-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2006.08.016. Epub 2006 Sep 25. J Biotechnol. 2007. PMID: 16997411
-
Transcriptome amplification methods in gene expression profiling.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006 May;6(3):465-80. doi: 10.1586/14737159.6.3.465. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2006. PMID: 16706747 Review.
-
RNA profiling in peripheral blood cells by fluorescent differential display PCR.Methods Mol Biol. 2009;496:211-22. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-553-4_14. Methods Mol Biol. 2009. PMID: 18839113 Review.
Cited by
-
Global array-based transcriptomics from minimal input RNA utilising an optimal RNA isolation process combined with SPIA cDNA probes.PLoS One. 2011 Mar 22;6(3):e17625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017625. PLoS One. 2011. PMID: 21445340 Free PMC article.
-
Laser capture microdissection: Big data from small samples.Histol Histopathol. 2015 Nov;30(11):1255-69. doi: 10.14670/HH-11-622. Epub 2015 Apr 20. Histol Histopathol. 2015. PMID: 25892148 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A comparison of RNA amplification techniques at sub-nanogram input concentration.BMC Genomics. 2009 Jul 20;10:326. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-326. BMC Genomics. 2009. PMID: 19619282 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of methods for amplification of picogram amounts of total RNA for whole genome expression profiling.BMC Genomics. 2009 May 26;10:246. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-246. BMC Genomics. 2009. PMID: 19470167 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of RNA labeling on expression profiling of microRNAs.J Mol Diagn. 2012 Jan;14(1):12-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.005. Epub 2011 Nov 7. J Mol Diagn. 2012. PMID: 22074760 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources