Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2006 Oct;244(4):611-9.
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000239086.30518.2a.

Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass

Vivek N Prachand et al. Ann Surg. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Although weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is acceptable in patients with preoperative body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 50 kg/m, results from several series demonstrate that failure rates approach 40% when BMI is > or =50 kg/m. Here we report the first large single institution series directly comparing weight-loss outcomes in super-obese patients following biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB).

Methods: All super-obese patients (BMI > or =50 kg/m) undergoing standardized laparoscopic and open DS and RYGB between August 2002 and October 2005 were identified from a prospective database. Two-sample t tests were used to compare weight loss, decrease in BMI, and percentage of excess body weight loss (% EBWL) after surgery. chi analysis was used to determine the rate of successful weight loss, defined as achieving at least 50% loss of excess body weight.

Results: A total of 350 super-obese patients underwent DS (n = 198) or RYGB (n = 152) with equal 30-day mortality (DS,1 of 198; RYGB, 0 of 152; P = not significant). The % EBWL at follow-up was greater for DS than RY (12 months, 64.1% vs. 55.9%; 18 months, 71. 9% vs. 62.8%; 24 months, 71.6% vs. 60.1%; 36 months, 68.9% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.05). Total weight loss and decrease in BMI were also statistically greater for the DS (data not shown). Importantly, the likelihood of successful weight loss (EBWL >50%) was significantly greater in patients following DS (12 months, 83.9% vs. 70.4%; 18 months, 90.3% vs. 75.9%; 36 months, 84.2% vs. 59.3%; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Direct comparison of DS to RYGB demonstrates superior weight loss outcomes for DS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
FIGURE 1. Weight loss following DS is greater than RYGB. DS, duodenal switch; RY, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Two-sample t tests were used for comparison. *P < 0.01.
None
FIGURE 2. Excess body weight loss following DS is greater than RYGB. DS, duodenal switch; RY, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. EBWL is expressed as a percentage; EBWL is calculated as: weight lost/(initial weight − ideal body weight). DS, duodenal switch; RY, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Two-sample t tests were used for comparison. *P < 0.01.
None
FIGURE 3. Comparison of body mass index (BMI) during follow-up. DS, duodenal switch; RY, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. By 3 years after surgery, despite having an initially greater BMI, the mean BMI was significantly less in the DS group. Two-sample t tests were used for comparison. *P < 0.05.
None
FIGURE 4. Comparison of changes in body mass index (BMI) over time. DS, duodenal switch; RY, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Two-sample t tests were used for comparison. *P < 0.01.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, et al. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288:1723–1727. - PubMed
    1. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, et al. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA. 2006;295:1549–1555. - PubMed
    1. Maggard MA, Shugarman LR, Suttorp M, et al. Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:547–559. - PubMed
    1. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Panel. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:956–961. - PubMed
    1. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292:1724–1737. - PubMed

Publication types