Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep 22;2(9):e155.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020155. Epub 2006 Aug 2.

Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of sgs1

Affiliations

Meiotic chromosome synapsis-promoting proteins antagonize the anti-crossover activity of sgs1

Lea Jessop et al. PLoS Genet. .

Abstract

Sgs1, the budding yeast homolog of the mammalian BLM helicase, has been implicated in preventing excess recombination during both vegetative growth and meiosis. Most meiotic crossover (CO) recombination requires full function of a set of yeast proteins (Zip1, Zip2, Zip3, Zip4/Spo22, Mer3, Msh4, and Msh5, termed the SIC or ZMM proteins) that are also required for homologous chromosome synapsis. We report here genetic and molecular assays showing that sgs1 single mutants display relatively modest increases in CO recombination (less than 1.6-fold relative to wild-type). In contrast, a much greater CO increase is seen when an sgs1 mutation is introduced into the CO- and synapsis-deficient zip1, zip2, zip3, mer3, or msh4 mutants (2- to 8-fold increase). Furthermore, close juxtaposition of the axes of homologous chromosomes is restored. CO restoration in the mutants is not accompanied by significant changes in noncrossover (NCO) recombinant frequencies. These findings show that Sgs1 has potent meiotic anti-CO activity, which is normally antagonized by SIC/ZMM proteins. Our data reinforce previous proposals for an early separation of meiotic processes that form CO and NCO recombinants.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Recombination Interval Used for Molecular Analyses
(A) The 3.5-kilobase ectopic recombination interval contains coding sequences for URA3 (gray) and ARG4 (black). DSBs form in the promoter regions of URA3 (DSB1) and ARG4 (DSB2). The lollipop in arg4 represents a palindromic sequence inserted at +9 of the open reading frame; this mutation is used to score gene conversion [16]. (B) The ectopic recombination interval is inserted at HIS4 (blue) on one copy of Chromosome III and at LEU2 (red) on the homolog. HIS4 and LEU2 are 16.7 kilobases apart. In rad50S strains, where DSBs persist, 5% of chromosomes have a DSB in his4::URA3-ARG4 and 0.7% have a DSB in leu2::URA3-ARG4 [16]. The centromere (black circle) and MAT locus (green) are also indicated. Allelic COs can be scored in the HIS4-LEU2 and LEU2-MAT intervals. (C) Ectopic COs can occur between his4::URA3-ARG4 and leu2::URA3-ARG4.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Loss of Full Sgs1 Activity Restores Spore Viability and Crossing Over to zmm Mutants
(A) Overall spore viability and patterns of spore lethality in tetrads from SK1 strains. (B) Map distance (cM; error bars denote standard error of map distance) in three intervals on Chromosome III in SK1 (see Figure 1B and 1C for details). Values for wild-type are from [16]. (C) Map distance in two allelic intervals on Chromosome III in BR strains. Values for wild-type and sgs1Δ are from [32].
Figure 3
Figure 3. Sgs1 Prevents COs in zmm Mutants
(A) Schematic representation of the ectopic URA3-ARG4 interval. Symbols are as in Figure 1. EcoRI (E) and XhoI (X) restrictions sites are indicated. To detect COs and DSBs, DNA is digested with XhoI and probed with ARG4 sequences (ArgD; [16]). To detect NCOs and a CO product (CO1′), DNA is digested with EcoRI and XhoI and probed with HIS4 sequences (HisU; [16]). (B) Southern blot of DNA isolated from a meiotic culture of MJL3035 (TRP1:SGS1) at the indicated time after initiation of sporulation, digested, and probed to detect COs and DSBs. mw, HinDIII digest of phage λ DNA. DSBs occur in URA3-ARG4 inserted at both his4 and leu2, but are ~7-fold stronger in the his4 insert than at leu2 [16]. Palindrome cleavage, by unidentified activities, occurs at the same time as CO formation and results in a band about the size of DSB2 (T. Allers, L. Jessop, and M. Lichten, unpublished data). (C) Southern blot of the same samples, digested and probed to detect NCO and CO1′ recombinants. HIS4, HIS4 locus lacking an insert; DSB*, DSB1 product where resection has passed the EcoRI site in HIS4; mw, BstEII digest of phage λ DNA. (D) Molecular analysis of mutants. Color codes: TRP1:SGS1, black; sgs1ΔC795, grey; TRP1:SGS1 zmm single mutants, red; sgs1ΔC795 zmm double mutants, blue. M1+M2, percent of cells containing at least two nuclei, a sign of passage through meiosis 1. DSB, DSB1 band signal/total lane signal from Southern blots as in (B). CO, CO1′ signal/total lane signal from Southern blots as in (C). NCO, NCO band signal/total insert signal from Southern blots as in (C).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Sgs1 Prevents AA in mer3Δ and zip3Δ Mutants
(A) Analysis of AAs in TRP1:SGS1 mer3Δ and mer3Δ sgs1ΔC795 SK1 strains. Nuclei from cells harvested 5 h after initiation of sporulation were surface spread and probed with anti-Zip (red) and anti-Red1 (green) antisera. Nuclei where chromosomes displayed linear Red1 were examined and classified as displaying minimal, partial, or full pseudosynapsis, as described in Materials and Methods. Nuclei with fully associated chromosomes displayed discontinuous Zip1 staining (right-hand example), Zip1 localization in polycomplexes (PC, left-hand example), or both. White bar: 2 microns. (B) Analysis of AAs in zip3Δ and zip3Δ sgs1Δ BR strains. Nuclei from cells harvested 18 h after the initiation of sporulation were spread, stained, and analyzed as for mer3 strains. In most nuclei with full AA, at least some chromosome pairs displayed end-to-end Zip1 staining with the remainder being pseudosynapsed.

References

    1. Strathern JN, Shafer BK, McGill CB. DNA synthesis errors associated with double-strand-break repair. Genetics. 1995;140:965–972. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Paques F, Haber JE. Multiple pathways of recombination induced by double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1999;63:349–404. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones GH. Chiasmata. In: Moens PB, editor. Meiosis. Orlando (Florida): Academic Press; 1987. pp. 213–244.
    1. Nicklas RB. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science. 1997;275:632–637. - PubMed
    1. Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. Un ménage à quatre: The molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell. 2003;112:423–440. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms