Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep-Oct;4(5):433-6.
doi: 10.1370/afm.576.

US men discussing prostate-specific antigen tests with a physician

Affiliations

US men discussing prostate-specific antigen tests with a physician

Stephanie L McFall. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: Informed decision making is recommended for prostate cancer screening. I wanted to examine demographic and screening-related factors associated with men's discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests with their physicians.

Methods: I used data from 2,184 men aged 50 years and older who reported a screening prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test in the 2000 National Health Interview Survey cancer control supplement. The dependent variable was discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of the test before it was conducted.

Results: Sixty-three percent of tested men reported a discussion in relation to their most recent PSA test. Discussion was more common for African American men and those with a usual source of care, and when the physician initiated the testing.

Conclusions: Characteristics of the patient-physician relationship were more central to the discussion of risks and benefits than were patient attributes. Future research should examine what role practice setting and the physician-patient relationship play in a discussion of PSA testing and how to facilitate active involvement of patients in decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67–80. - PubMed
    1. Becker DM, DeMong LK, Kaplan P, et al. Anticoagulation therapy and primary care internal medicine: a nurse practitioner model for combined clinical science. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:525–527. - PubMed
    1. Sheridan SL, Harris RP, Woolf SH. Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:56–66. - PubMed
    1. Barry MJ. Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:127–135. - PubMed
    1. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) best practice policy. American Uro-logical Association (AUA). Oncology (Williston Park). 2000;14:267–272, 277–268, 280 passim. - PubMed

Substances