Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Sep-Oct;4(5):437-42.
doi: 10.1370/afm.555.

NIH funding in family medicine: an analysis of 2003 awards

Affiliations

NIH funding in family medicine: an analysis of 2003 awards

Howard K Rabinowitz et al. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: We wanted to analyze National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to departments of family medicine.

Methods: We obtained the list of NIH awards to departments of family medicine in 2003, and collected additional information from the Internet regarding each principal investigator (PI), including whether he or she worked primarily in a core (central) organizational component within a family medicine department.

Results: One hundred forty-nine NIH awards were granted to 45 departments of family medicine, for a total of 60,085,000 dollars. Of 146 awards with a designated PI, approximately two thirds of awards (89, 61%) and awarded dollars (39,850,000 dollars, 70%) went to PIs who were either not full-time family medicine faculty primarily working in family medicine departments, or they were not working in core family medicine organizational components. Few awards to physician PIs in these non-core areas were to family physicians (4 of 37, 11%), whereas most awards to physician PIs in core family medicine areas went to family physicians (40 of 45, 89%). In contrast, most K awards (research career programs) went to PIs in core areas (19 of 23, 83%), and most to family physicians (17 of 23, 74%). Nationally, only 17 R01 awards (research project, traditional) went to family physicians.

Conclusions: Most NIH awards to family medicine departments went to PIs in noncore organizational components, where most physician PIs were not family physicians. Family medicine departments interested in increasing NIH funding may want to consider 4 models that appear to exist: individual faculty in core departmental components, K awards, core faculty also working in university-wide organizational components that provide research infrastructure, and integrating noncore administrative components into the department.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Value of National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to departments of family medicine, by department, 2003.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Percentage of National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to principal investigators in core organizational components of departments of family medicine, 2003.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Percentage of National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to principal investigators (PIs) who are physicians, and percentage of NIH awards to physician PIs who are family physicians, by core and noncore organizational components of departments of family medicine, 2003.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Campos-Outcalt D, Senf J. Family medicine research funding. Fam Med. 1999;31:709–712. - PubMed
    1. Mainous AG, 3rd, Hueston WJ, Ye X, Bazell C. A comparison of family medicine research in research intense and less intense institutions. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1100–1104. - PubMed
    1. Brocato JJ, Mavis B. The research productivity of faculty in family medicine departments at U.S. medical schools: a national study. Acad Med. 2005;80:244–252. - PubMed
    1. Stange KC, Miller WL, McWhinney I. Developing the knowledge base of family practice. Fam Med. 2001;33:286–297. - PubMed
    1. Murata PJ, Lynch WD, Puffer JC, Green LA. Attitudes toward and experience in research among family medicine chairs. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:417–421. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms