Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome
- PMID: 17003396
- PMCID: PMC2538673
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1479
Prediction of germline mutations and cancer risk in the Lynch syndrome
Abstract
Context: Identifying families at high risk for the Lynch syndrome (ie, hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer) is critical for both genetic counseling and cancer prevention. Current clinical guidelines are effective but limited by applicability and cost.
Objective: To develop and validate a genetic counseling and risk prediction tool that estimates the probability of carrying a deleterious mutation in mismatch repair genes MLH1, MSH2, or MSH6 and the probability of developing colorectal or endometrial cancer.
Design, setting, and patients: External validation of the MMRpro model was conducted on 279 individuals from 226 clinic-based families in the United States, Canada, and Australia (referred between 1993-2005) by comparing model predictions with results of highly sensitive germline mutation detection techniques. MMRpro models the autosomal dominant inheritance of mismatch repair mutations, with parameters based on meta-analyses of the penetrance and prevalence of mutations and of the predictive values of tumor characteristics. The model's prediction is tailored to each individual's detailed family history information on colorectal and endometrial cancer and to tumor characteristics including microsatellite instability.
Main outcome measure: Ability of MMRpro to correctly predict mutation carrier status, as measured by operating characteristics, calibration, and overall accuracy.
Results: In the independent validation, MMRpro provided a concordance index of 0.83 (95% confidence interval, 0.78-0.88) and a ratio of observed to predicted cases of 0.94 (95% confidence interval, 0.84-1.05). This results in higher accuracy than existing alternatives and current clinical guidelines.
Conclusions: MMRpro is a broadly applicable, accurate prediction model that can contribute to current screening and genetic counseling practices in a high-risk population. It is more sensitive and more specific than existing clinical guidelines for identifying individuals who may benefit from MMR germline testing. It is applicable to individuals for whom tumor samples are not available and to individuals in whom germline testing finds no mutation.
Figures


Comment in
-
Predicting and preventing hereditary colorectal cancer.JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1521-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1521. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 17003401 No abstract available.
-
The MMRpro model accurately predicted the probability of carrying a cancer-susceptibility gene mutation for the Lynch syndrome.ACP J Club. 2007 Mar-Apr;146(2):53. ACP J Club. 2007. PMID: 17335176 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of Prediction Models for Lynch Syndrome Among Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 18;108(2):djv308. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv308. Print 2016 Feb. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26582061 Free PMC article.
-
Prediction of MLH1 and MSH2 mutations in Lynch syndrome.JAMA. 2006 Sep 27;296(12):1469-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.12.1469. JAMA. 2006. PMID: 17003395
-
Screening for germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes in Slovenian colorectal cancer patients: implications for a population specific detection strategy of Lynch syndrome.Fam Cancer. 2009;8(4):421-9. doi: 10.1007/s10689-009-9258-4. Epub 2009 Jun 13. Fam Cancer. 2009. PMID: 19526325
-
Cancer risks associated with germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 genes in Lynch syndrome.JAMA. 2011 Jun 8;305(22):2304-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.743. JAMA. 2011. PMID: 21642682
-
Criteria and prediction models for mismatch repair gene mutations: a review.J Med Genet. 2013 Dec;50(12):785-93. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101803. Epub 2013 Aug 16. J Med Genet. 2013. PMID: 23956446 Review.
Cited by
-
Lynch syndrome related endometrial cancer: clinical significance beyond the endometrium.J Hematol Oncol. 2013 Mar 25;6:22. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-6-22. J Hematol Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23531335 Free PMC article.
-
Advances in Hereditary Colorectal and Pancreatic Cancers.Clin Ther. 2016 Jul;38(7):1600-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.03.017. Epub 2016 Apr 2. Clin Ther. 2016. PMID: 27045993 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Development and evaluation of INT2GRATE: a platform for comprehensive assessment of the role of germline variants informed by tumor signature profile in Lynch syndrome.Front Oncol. 2024 Jan 24;13:1284690. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1284690. eCollection 2023. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38344144 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the clinical prediction model PREMM(1,2,6) and molecular testing for the systematic identification of Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer.Gut. 2013 Feb;62(2):272-9. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301265. Epub 2012 Feb 16. Gut. 2013. PMID: 22345660 Free PMC article.
-
The identification of Lynch syndrome in British Columbia.Can J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;23(11):761-7. doi: 10.1155/2009/620518. Can J Gastroenterol. 2009. PMID: 19893772 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Boland CR, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute workshop on hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome: meeting highlights and Bethesda guidelines. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1758–1762. - PubMed
-
- Papadopoulos N, Nicolaides NC, Wei YF, et al. Mutation of a mutL homolog in hereditary colon cancer. Science. 1994;263:1625–1629. - PubMed
-
- Bronner CE, Baker SM, Morrison PT, et al. Mutation in the DNA mismatch repair gene homologue hMLH1 is associated with hereditary non-polyposis colon cancer. Nature. 1994;368:258–261. - PubMed
-
- Leach FS, Nicolaides NC, Papadopoulos N, et al. Mutations of a mutS homolog in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer. Cell. 1993;75:1215–1225. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous