Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing
- PMID: 17003712
- DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234915.51189.cb
Clinical significance of results from olfactory testing
Abstract
Background: Although widely used in healthy subjects and patients with olfactory loss, the significance of changes of scores from validated olfactory tests is unknown.
Aim and methods: The aim of the present study was to relate the self-assigned changes of olfactory function in terms of "better," "unchanged," and "worse" in patients with smell disorders with the results from olfactory testing by means of a validated test set. Olfactory function of 83 anosmic or hyposmic patients (40 women, 43 men; age 12-84 yr) was tested on two occasions (mean interval 136 days, minimum 7 days, maximum 6.7 yr). Olfactory function was assessed using a validated technique ("Sniffin' Sticks"). This test consists of three subtests, one for odor threshold (T), odor discrimination (D), and odor identification (I), with possible results ranging up to 16 points each. From the sum of the results from the three subtests a composite "TDI" score was obtained.
Results: Forty-four patients indicated an improvement of olfactory function, whereas 39 patients reported no change. No subject reported deterioration of olfactory sensitivity. Subjects assigned to group BETTER had higher TDI scores in the second olfactory tests than subjects assigned to the group UNCHANGED, both in absolute terms and as compared with the first olfactory test (effect "test occasion" by "self-assessed improvement," P < .001). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to age and sex (P = .99 and .84, respectively). Logistic regression showed that more than 60% of the subjects reported an improvement of olfactory sensitivity when the TDI score increased by 5.5 points.
Conclusion: We show that there is a statistically significant relation between measured and perceived improvement of olfactory function in patients who first presented with the diagnosis of anosmia or hyposmia. The results indicate that improved olfactory function in patients with olfactory deficiency is perceived as such in everyday life and is quantitatively related to an improvement in the composite TDI score of the "Sniffin' Sticks" olfactory test battery. This is the basis for the application of a specific therapy for olfactory loss because of a possible gain in quality of life for the patients.
Similar articles
-
The clinical significance of electrophysiological measures of olfactory function.Behav Brain Res. 2006 Jun 3;170(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2006.02.013. Epub 2006 Mar 24. Behav Brain Res. 2006. PMID: 16563529
-
Normative data for the "Sniffin' Sticks" including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Mar;264(3):237-43. doi: 10.1007/s00405-006-0173-0. Epub 2006 Sep 23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007. PMID: 17021776
-
[Clinical application of Sniffin' Sticks olfactory psychophysical measurements].Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;48(9):741-5. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013. PMID: 24330876 Chinese.
-
Assessment of Olfactory Function in Children and Adolescents: An Overview.Chem Senses. 2021 Jan 1;46:bjab027. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjab027. Chem Senses. 2021. PMID: 34237138 Review.
-
The perception of odor is not a surrogate marker for chemical exposure: a review of factors influencing human odor perception.Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013 Feb;51(2):70-6. doi: 10.3109/15563650.2013.767908. Clin Toxicol (Phila). 2013. PMID: 23387344 Review.
Cited by
-
Olfactory training: what is the evidence?Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020 Nov;10(11):1199-1200. doi: 10.1002/alr.22681. Epub 2020 Sep 3. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2020. PMID: 32776673 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Body-Mass-Index Associated Differences in Ortho- and Retronasal Olfactory Function and the Individual Significance of Olfaction in Health and Disease.J Clin Med. 2020 Jan 29;9(2):366. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020366. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32013176 Free PMC article.
-
Odours count: human olfactory ecology appears to be helpful in the improvement of the sense of smell.Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 19;11(1):16888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96334-3. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34413403 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions for the prevention of persistent post-COVID-19 olfactory dysfunction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 5;9(9):CD013877. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013877.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36063364 Free PMC article.
-
Essential Oil Olfactory Test: Comparison of Affordable Rapid Olfaction Measurement Array (AROMA) to Sniffin' Sticks 12.OTO Open. 2020 Oct 13;4(4):2473974X20962464. doi: 10.1177/2473974X20962464. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec. OTO Open. 2020. PMID: 33748649 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical