Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2006 Jun;28(3):152-8.
doi: 10.1007/s11096-006-9020-z. Epub 2006 Sep 27.

Characteristics of drug-related problems discussed by hospital pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Characteristics of drug-related problems discussed by hospital pharmacists in multidisciplinary teams

Hege Salvesen Blix et al. Pharm World Sci. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate pharmacist contribution in the therapeutic hospital team by studying drug-related problems (DRPs), pharmacist therapy advice and consequences of the advice.

Methods: From May to December 2002, 827 patients in five Norwegian hospitals were included in the study. Demographic data, drugs used, relevant medical history, laboratory data and clinical/pharmacological risk factors were recorded prospectively at the wards.

Main outcome measure: DRPs, patients characteristics, pharmacist advice to physicians, nurses or patients, response to the pharmacist advice, and reasons (stated by the pharmacist) for not discussing an identified DRP, were reported. An independent quality assessment team retrospectively assessed the DRPs for a randomly selected number of the study population.

Results: On average 2.6 DRPs per patient were found. A total of 2128 DRPs were registered and of these 1583 (74%) DRPs were brought up for discussion. Physician immediate acceptance rates varied from 80% (for extremely important clinically significant DRPs) to 50% (for DRPs of minor clinical significance). High age, use of many drugs at admission, existence of many DRPs and many clinical/pharmacological risk factors for DRPs were associated with low immediate acceptance rate. Type of DRP influenced how the DRP was discussed; adverse drug reaction (ADR) and unnecessary drug were discussed with physicians while e.g. medical chart error and need for patient education were discussed with nurses/patients. Reasons for not discussing DRPs in the team were: not given priority (37%), no longer relevant (31%) and others (31%). DRPs of minor clinical significance were most often excluded from discussion (37%) as opposed to 14% and 22% of those of moderate and major clinical significance.

Conclusions: The majority of patients had one or more DRPs. The problems identified as DRPs by the pharmacists were accepted as such by the physicians and to a high degree acted upon. Both clinical significance of the DRP and patient characteristics influenced physician immediate acceptance rate. Some DRPs could be solved by direct contact with nurses or the patients. Awareness of DRPs increases through participation of pharmacists in the multidisciplinary therapeutic hospital team.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am J Med. 1996 Apr;100(4):428-37 - PubMed
    1. Palliat Med. 1997 May;11(3):209-16 - PubMed
    1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001 Jan 1;58(1):63-6 - PubMed
    1. Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):1050-61 - PubMed
    1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997 Mar 15;54(6):670-3 - PubMed

Publication types