[Jealousy in close relationships: personal, relational and situational variables]
- PMID: 17004170
[Jealousy in close relationships: personal, relational and situational variables]
Abstract
Purpose: In this study, the effects of personal, situational, and relational variables (such as age, gender, gender role orientation, duration of relationship, relational satisfaction, and physical attractiveness of the partner) on jealousy are investigated.
Methods: A sample of 454 individuals currently involved in dating or marital relationships (48 % married, 52 % unmarried) completed the Romantic Jealousy Questionnaire, Bem Sex Role Inventory, and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. Stepwise regression analyses and 2 (gender) x2 (gender role orientation) x2 (relational type) ANOVA's were submitted for analyzing the data.
Results: Analysis indicated that unmarried people reported higher levels of jealousy than married people (F1-446 = 5.029). Married women reported less jealousy than unmarried women and married women reported more jealousy than married men. Age, relational satisfaction level, expectation level about the duration of the relationship, and physical attractiveness of the partner were unique predictors of the reported level of jealousy (R2 = 0.12; adjusted R2 = 0.11; P < 0.05). Women reported that they have more physical, emotional, and cognitive responses to jealousy compared to men. Women used more constructive (F1-446 = 6.27) and less destructive strategies than men (F1-446 = 6.27). Unmarried people used more destructive strategies than married people (F1-446 = 3.84). Age, self-esteem, and the duration of the relationship were unique predictors of coping strategies.
Conclusion: The present study revealed that jealousy was a multidimensional variable. In particular, relational type, self-esteem, age, relational satisfaction, and sex are highly correlated with jealousy.
Similar articles
-
Emotional and physical satisfaction in noncohabiting, cohabiting, and marital relationships: the importance of jealous conflict.J Sex Res. 2011 Jan;48(1):29-42. doi: 10.1080/00224490903370602. J Sex Res. 2011. PMID: 19941192
-
Gender-typical responses to sexual and emotional infidelity as a function of mortality salience induced self-esteem striving.Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Dec;29(12):1585-95. doi: 10.1177/0146167203256880. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003. PMID: 15018688
-
Affective and behavioral responses to friends who neglect their friends for dating partners: influences of gender, jealousy and perspective.J Adolesc. 2001 Jun;24(3):281-96. doi: 10.1006/jado.2001.0408. J Adolesc. 2001. PMID: 11476607
-
[Sex differences in sexual versus emotional jealousy: evolutionary approach and recent discussions].Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008 Fall;19(3):300-9. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2008. PMID: 18791883 Review. Turkish.
-
Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences.Dan Med Bull. 2006 Nov;53(4):390-417. Dan Med Bull. 2006. PMID: 17150146 Review.
Cited by
-
What's love got to do with jealousy?Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 28;14:1249556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1249556. eCollection 2023. Front Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37842714 Free PMC article.
-
Compersion: When Jealousy-Inducing Situations Don't (Just) Induce Jealousy.Arch Sex Behav. 2021 May;50(4):1311-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1. Epub 2021 May 26. Arch Sex Behav. 2021. PMID: 34041641
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical