PMF scoring revisited
- PMID: 17004705
- DOI: 10.1021/jm050038s
PMF scoring revisited
Abstract
Knowledge-based scoring functions have become accepted choices for fast scoring putative protein-ligand complexes according to their binding affinities. Since their introduction 5 years ago, the knowledge base of protein-ligand complexes has grown to the point were rederiving potentials of mean force becomes meaningful for statistical reasons. Revisiting potential of mean force (PMF) scoring (J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 791), we present an updated PMF04 scoring function that is based on 7152 protein-ligand complexes from the PDB. This constitutes an increase of about 10-fold compared to the knowledge base of the original PMF99 score (697 complexes). Because of the increased statistical basis of the PMF04 score, potentials for metal ions have been derived for the first time. In addition, potentials for halogens have reached statistical significance and are included also. Comparison of scoring accuracies between PMF99 and PMF04 shows an increased performance of the new score for many well-established test sets. Extending the testing of PMF scoring to the recently introduced PDBbind database containing the large number of 800 protein-ligand complexes illustrates the current limits of the approach.
Similar articles
-
A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.J Med Chem. 1999 Mar 11;42(5):791-804. doi: 10.1021/jm980536j. J Med Chem. 1999. PMID: 10072678
-
An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004 Nov-Dec;44(6):2114-25. doi: 10.1021/ci049733j. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2004. PMID: 15554682
-
General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.Proteins. 2005 Nov 1;61(2):272-87. doi: 10.1002/prot.20588. Proteins. 2005. PMID: 16106379
-
Ranking poses in structure-based lead discovery and optimization: current trends in scoring function development.Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007 May;10(3):308-15. Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel. 2007. PMID: 17554857 Review.
-
Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps.J Med Chem. 2006 Oct 5;49(20):5851-5. doi: 10.1021/jm060999m. J Med Chem. 2006. PMID: 17004700 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Building a virtual ligand screening pipeline using free software: a survey.Brief Bioinform. 2016 Mar;17(2):352-66. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbv037. Epub 2015 Jun 20. Brief Bioinform. 2016. PMID: 26094053 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessing multiple score functions in Rosetta for drug discovery.PLoS One. 2020 Oct 12;15(10):e0240450. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240450. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33044994 Free PMC article.
-
Analyzing (3-Aminopropyl)triethoxysilane-Functionalized Porous Silica for Aqueous Uranium Removal: A Study on the Adsorption Behavior.Molecules. 2024 Feb 9;29(4):803. doi: 10.3390/molecules29040803. Molecules. 2024. PMID: 38398554 Free PMC article.
-
Application of docking-based comparative intermolecular contacts analysis to validate Hsp90α docking studies and subsequent in silico screening for inhibitors.J Mol Model. 2012 Nov;18(11):4843-63. doi: 10.1007/s00894-012-1479-z. Epub 2012 Jun 16. J Mol Model. 2012. PMID: 22707278
-
Inclusion of solvation and entropy in the knowledge-based scoring function for protein-ligand interactions.J Chem Inf Model. 2010 Feb 22;50(2):262-73. doi: 10.1021/ci9002987. J Chem Inf Model. 2010. PMID: 20088605 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources