Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads
- PMID: 17006370
- DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238851.31368.e7
Dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty with 36 and 40-mm femoral heads
Abstract
Some authors suggest the use of larger (36 and 40 mm) femoral heads against highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners will reduce the prevalence of early dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We prospectively followed 61 consecutive patients at high risk for dislocation to determine the prevalence of early dislocation after primary THA with 36 and 40 mm femoral heads. We established specific indications for the use of these larger heads in primary arthroplasty. There were 65 hips in 61 patients with a minimum followup of 1 year (mean 2 years, range 1-4 years). There were 55 36 mm heads and 10 40 mm heads. All arthroplasties were performed by the posterior approach with capsular repair. The prevalence of early dislocation was 4.6% (3 of 65). There was one patient with an anterior dislocation and two with posterior dislocation. No patient underwent reoperation for dislocation. There was no dislocation in the 10 hips that had a 40 mm head. We identified no complications related to the larger femoral heads. The use of larger femoral heads did not notably reduce the prevalence of early dislocation after primary THA in high risk patients compared to historical controls.
Similar articles
-
Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty. 2007 Sep;22(6 Suppl 2):140-4. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.019. Epub 2007 Jul 27. J Arthroplasty. 2007. PMID: 17823033
-
Implant survival after primary total hip arthroplasty due to childhood hip disorders: results from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry.Acta Orthop. 2008 Dec;79(6):769-76. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016830. Acta Orthop. 2008. PMID: 19085493
-
Decreased dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty using larger femoral head size and posterior capsular repair.J Arthroplasty. 2009 Sep;24(6 Suppl):73-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.026. Epub 2009 Jul 4. J Arthroplasty. 2009. PMID: 19577890
-
Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners.J Arthroplasty. 2008 Oct;23(7 Suppl):59-63. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.032. J Arthroplasty. 2008. PMID: 18922375 Review.
-
Use of modular large femoral heads without liners in hip arthroplasty.Surg Technol Int. 2006;15:217-20. Surg Technol Int. 2006. PMID: 17029179 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in hip arthroplasty surgery: what is justified?EFORT Open Rev. 2017 May 11;2(5):171-178. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.2.170008. eCollection 2017 May. EFORT Open Rev. 2017. PMID: 28630755 Free PMC article.
-
Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Jul;472(7):2217-30. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3556-3. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014. PMID: 24700446 Free PMC article.
-
The Frank Stinchfield Award: Dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40 mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012 Feb;470(2):351-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-011-2146-x. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012. PMID: 22038174 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The economical and reliable image free navigation system for acetabular cup implantation in total hip arthroplasty.J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Mar 29;65:102991. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2025.102991. eCollection 2025 Jun. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025. PMID: 40255865
-
Do large femoral heads reduce the risks of impingement in total hip arthroplasty with optimal and non-optimal cup positioning?Int Orthop. 2011 Mar;35(3):317-23. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-0954-3. Epub 2010 Feb 17. Int Orthop. 2011. PMID: 20157813 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical