Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Nov;7(6):536-40.
doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000243722.71203.5C.

Characteristics and outcomes of interhospital transfers from level II to level I pediatric intensive care units

Affiliations

Characteristics and outcomes of interhospital transfers from level II to level I pediatric intensive care units

Folafoluwa O Odetola et al. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the characteristics, resource utilization, and outcomes for transfer admissions from level II to level I pediatric intensive care units (PICUs).

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: A 16-bed level I PICU in a tertiary care children's hospital.

Patients: All transfer admissions from level II PICUs from January 1, 1997, through December 31, 2003; admissions for cardiac surgery were excluded. Patient characteristics, resource utilization, and outcomes were described and then compared across predefined strata (low <5%, moderate 5-30%, and high >30%) of predicted probability of death.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Of 168 transfer admissions, 45%, 30%, and 25% were in the low, moderate, and high mortality risk groups, respectively. Length of stay at the referring PICU was shortest for the high-risk admissions. The most frequent diagnoses among all risk groups were respiratory failure (49%) and sepsis (14%). High-risk admissions were more likely to receive advanced therapies such as extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (41.5% high risk vs. 39.2% moderate vs. 6.6% low risk, p < .01) and renal replacement therapy (34.2% vs. 17.7% vs. 2.6%, p < .01). The high-risk admissions had longer PICU length of stay and the highest death rates (34% vs. 10% vs. 4%, p < .01) when compared with the moderate- and low-risk admissions, respectively.

Conclusions: This study highlights significant differences in patient characteristics, resource utilization, and outcomes across mortality risk-stratified groups of critically ill and injured children transferred from level II to level I PICU care. Further studies are warranted to investigate decision making that prompt inter-PICU transfers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Level II pediatric intensive care units.
    Pollack MM. Pollack MM. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;7(6):606-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000244097.63986.C1. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006. PMID: 17091104 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources