Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults
- PMID: 17006685
- DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0704-3
Controlling reaching movements with predictable and unpredictable target motion in 10-year-old children and adults
Abstract
We investigated interception behavior in adults and 10-year-old children. Participants had to intercept virtual targets moving on either a predictable (linear) or unpredictable (non-linear) path (with random direction changes). Targets moved at two different velocities, which varied randomly from trial to trial. Participants reached for the targets via a force-feedback device. Reaching movements for linearly moving targets in a block of linearly moving targets were compared with reaching movements for linearly moving targets in the context of non-linearly moving targets. Movement direction and maximum speed of the first sub-movement were analyzed as well as frequency of target hits and number of sub-movements. Unpredictable target motion caused faster movement speeds than predictable target motion for both children and adults. Additionally, unpredictable target motion caused children and adults to gear their initial movement direction further towards the current position of the target, while with predictable target motion, they geared their initial movement direction further ahead of the target towards an anticipated interception position. Together, these results suggest differential processing of predictable and unpredictable object behavior in an interception task, and that this differential processing is already in place in 10-year-olds.
Similar articles
-
Constraints on the spatiotemporal accuracy of interceptive action: effects of target size on hitting a moving target.Exp Brain Res. 2004 Apr;155(4):509-26. doi: 10.1007/s00221-003-1793-x. Epub 2004 Mar 4. Exp Brain Res. 2004. PMID: 14999437
-
How moving backgrounds influence interception.PLoS One. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0119903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0119903. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 25767873 Free PMC article.
-
Intercepting a moving target: effects of temporal precision constraints and movement amplitude.Exp Brain Res. 2002 Jan;142(2):193-207. doi: 10.1007/s00221-001-0920-9. Epub 2001 Nov 28. Exp Brain Res. 2002. PMID: 11807574
-
Acting while perceiving: assimilation precedes contrast.Psychol Res. 2009 Jan;73(1):3-13. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0146-6. Epub 2008 Mar 26. Psychol Res. 2009. PMID: 18365250 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.Exp Brain Res. 2009 Feb;192(4):571-604. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1691-3. Epub 2009 Jan 13. Exp Brain Res. 2009. PMID: 19139857 Review.
Cited by
-
Using deep learning to classify developmental differences in reaching and placing movements in children with and without autism spectrum disorder.Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 5;14(1):30283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-81652-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39632922 Free PMC article.
-
To know or not to know: influence of explicit advance knowledge of occlusion on interceptive actions.Exp Brain Res. 2011 Oct;214(4):483-90. doi: 10.1007/s00221-011-2846-1. Epub 2011 Aug 30. Exp Brain Res. 2011. PMID: 21877101
-
Advance knowledge effects on kinematics of one-handed catching.Exp Brain Res. 2010 Apr;201(4):875-84. doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-2102-0. Epub 2009 Dec 1. Exp Brain Res. 2010. PMID: 19949776
-
Effects of Future Information and Trajectory Complexity on Kinematic Signal and Muscle Activation during Visual-Motor Tracking.Entropy (Basel). 2021 Jan 15;23(1):111. doi: 10.3390/e23010111. Entropy (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33467619 Free PMC article.
-
When intercepting moving targets, mid-movement error corrections reflect distinct responses to visual and haptic perturbations.Exp Brain Res. 2023 Jan;241(1):231-247. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06515-3. Epub 2022 Dec 5. Exp Brain Res. 2023. PMID: 36469052 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources