Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Jun;3(2):89-96.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00212.x.

Prediction and monitoring the therapeutic response of chronic dermal wounds

Affiliations
Review

Prediction and monitoring the therapeutic response of chronic dermal wounds

Keith Moore et al. Int Wound J. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

A significant proportion of chronic wounds fail to heal in response to treatment of underlying pathologies combined with good wound care practice. Current prognostic tests to identify these wounds rely on the use of algorithms based on clinically measurable parameters such as wound dimensions and wound duration. Venous leg ulcers may be stratified into healing/non healing at 24 weeks of compression therapy and diabetic foot ulcer treatment outcome assessed using a 3-parameter algorithm. Accurate and reproducible measurement of wound area is required for these algorithms to have clinical utility. Whilst a number of attempts have been made to develop computerised wound-assessment techniques, wound tracing by clinicians combined with planimetry remains the standard methodology. Once treatment has been initiated, it is important to continuously monitor the wound to assess efficacy of treatment. This can be achieved by measuring wound area change over the first weeks of treatment to identify whether re-assessment of treatment strategy is required. A number of algorithms for assessing rate of wound area change have been evaluated to determine a surrogate endpoint for healing. Retrospective analysis of large patient groups indicates that approximately 75% correct prediction of healing outcome can be achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Cherry GW, Hughes MA, Leaper DJ, Ferguson MWJ. Wound healing. In: Morris PJ, Wood WC, editors. Oxford text book of surgery, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002: 129–59.
    1. Marks JL, Hughes E, Harding KG, Campbell H, Ribeiro CD. Prediction of healing time as an aid to the management of open granulating wounds. World J Surg 1983;7: 641–5. - PubMed
    1. Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol 2002;46: 381–6. - PubMed
    1. Reiber GE. The epidemiology of diabetic foot problems. Diabet Med 1998;13 Suppl: S6–S11. - PubMed
    1. Amlung SR, Miller WL, Bosley LM. The 1999 national pressure ulcer prevalence survey: a benchmarking approach. Adv Skin Wound Care 2001;14(2):297–301. - PubMed