Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Jun;3(2):133-7.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00189.x.

The management of wounds following primary lower limb arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study comparing hydrofibre and central pad dressings

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The management of wounds following primary lower limb arthroplasty: a prospective, randomised study comparing hydrofibre and central pad dressings

Tarek M Abuzakuk et al. Int Wound J. 2006 Jun.

Abstract

Wound care following lower limb arthroplasty has not been subject to in-depth clinical research, primarily because such wounds usually heal without complication. However, when prosthetic implants are used, serious wound problems can be disastrous (Whitehouse et al. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23:183-9; Lindwell OM. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;211:91-103). We report the results of a prospective, randomised, controlled trial comparing a hydrofibre (Aquacel) and central pad (Mepore) dressing in the management of acute wounds following primary total hip or knee arthroplasty left to heal by primary intention. Dressing performance was measured in 61 patients receiving total hip or knee replacements. There was a significant reduction in the requirement for dressing changes before five postoperative days in the hydrofibre group (43% compared with 77% in the central pad group), and there were fewer blisters amongst patients in the hydrofibre group (13% compared with 26% in the central pad group). We conclude that there is a potential role for hydrofibre dressing in the management of arthroplasty wounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical‐site infections following orthopaedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002;23(2):183–9. - PubMed
    1. Lawrentschuk N, Falkenberg MP, Pirpiris M. Wound blisters post hip surgery: a prospective trial comparing dressings. ANZ J. Surg 2002;72: 716–9. - PubMed
    1. Gupta SK, Lee S, Moseley LG. Postoperative wound blistering: is there a link with dressing usage? J Wound Care 2002;11(7):271–3. - PubMed
    1. Foster L, Moore P. The application of a cellulose‐based fibre dressing in the surgical wounds. J Wound Care 1997; 6(10): 469–73. - PubMed
    1. Foster L, Moore P, Clarke S. A comparison of hydrofibre and alginate dressings on open surgical wounds. J Wound Care 2000;9(9):442–5. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances