Diabetes retinopathy screening: audit of equity in participation and selected outcomes in South East London
- PMID: 17007657
- DOI: 10.1258/096914106778440608
Diabetes retinopathy screening: audit of equity in participation and selected outcomes in South East London
Abstract
Objectives: To assess uptake of the diabetes retinopathy screening programme in South East London and examine variation in attendance and screening outcomes.
Methods: Cross-sectional study of patients on a centralized disease register invited for retinal screening during 2003. The influence of age, gender, deprivation, region of birth and type of diabetes on screening attendance and outcomes was assessed.
Results: An estimated 46% of residents with known diabetes (9750/21,104) were offered digital retinopathy screening during 2003. In all, 88.9% of patients who were invited for screening attended. Attendance rates were significantly lower in younger patients (< or = 40 years), in those with type 1 diabetes and in patients residing in areas with the highest levels of deprivation. A total of 28.9% of patients had background retinopathy or worse during 2003. Retinopathy was more common in older patients (>40 years) and in individuals with type 1 diabetes after adjusting for other factors. Patients born outside the United Kingdom and the Republic of Ireland were significantly more likely to present with retinopathy.
Conclusions: This study identified considerable inequity in the delivery of a local diabetic retinopathy screening programme. Equity audits should form an integral component of ongoing quality assurance monitoring of retinopathy screening programmes.
Similar articles
-
Socio-economic and ethnic inequalities in diabetes retinal screening.Diabet Med. 2010 Mar;27(3):282-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2010.02946.x. Diabet Med. 2010. PMID: 20536490
-
Socioeconomic factors related to attendance at a Type 2 diabetes screening programme.Diabet Med. 2009 May;26(5):518-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02715.x. Diabet Med. 2009. PMID: 19646192
-
Duration of diabetes and screening coverage for retinopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes.Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):76-9. doi: 10.1080/09286580600879032. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007. PMID: 17464854
-
Are there disparities in care in people with diabetes? A review of care provided in general practice.J Prim Health Care. 2009 Sep;1(3):177-83. J Prim Health Care. 2009. PMID: 20690380 Review.
-
[Screening for diabetic retinopathy].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007 Jan 27;151(4):228-33. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007. PMID: 17323877 Review. Dutch.
Cited by
-
Social deprivation as a risk factor for late presentation of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb 17;9:347-52. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S73272. eCollection 2015. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015. PMID: 25733801 Free PMC article.
-
Association between education and quality of diabetes care in Switzerland.Int J Gen Med. 2015 Feb 25;8:87-92. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S77139. eCollection 2015. Int J Gen Med. 2015. PMID: 25759596 Free PMC article.
-
Understanding the uptake of a national retinopathy screening programme: An audit of patients with diabetes in two large primary care centres.HRB Open Res. 2019 Jul 26;2:17. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.12926.2. eCollection 2019. HRB Open Res. 2019. PMID: 32104778 Free PMC article.
-
Self reported receipt of care consistent with 32 quality indicators: national population survey of adults aged 50 or more in England.BMJ. 2008 Aug 13;337:a957. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a957. BMJ. 2008. PMID: 18703659 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and enablers to diabetic retinopathy screening: a cross-sectional survey of young adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the UK.BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Nov;10(6):e002971. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2022-002971. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022. PMID: 36418058 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical