Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;56(531):763-7.

Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding

Affiliations

Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding

Roma Robertson et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Rectal bleeding is an important symptom of colorectal cancer but has low predictive value in primary care.

Aim: To determine which characteristics of rectal bleeding, along with other factors, are predictive of colorectal cancer.

Design of study: Observation study of patients with rectal bleeding referred to an open-access diagnostic clinic.

Setting: Primary care, southern England.

Method: Symptom data were collected, using a self-completed questionnaire. Logistic regression techniques were used to determine predictors of colorectal cancer.

Results: There were 604 patients in the study and 22 (3.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.0% to 5.2%) were diagnosed with colorectal cancer. Significant predictors of colorectal cancer were found to be age (<50 years: odds ratio [OR] = 1; 50-69 years: OR = 5.1, 95% CI = 1.4 to 18.6; > or = 70 years: OR = 8.2, 95% CI = 2.1 to 31.8) and blood mixed with the stool (Likelihood ratio [LR] 1.5; adjusted OR = 3.8; 95% CI = 1.4 to 10.5). Presence of haemorrhoids associated with bright red bleeding not mixed with stool reduced the likelihood of cancer (OR = 0.4, 95% CI = 0.1 to 1.2) but did not eliminate it--a cancer was present in 2% of patients with these symptoms.

Conclusion: Patient-reported type of rectal bleeding as an isolated symptom has insufficient diagnostic value to be useful in general practice. By studying referred patients, we may even have overestimated its value. At best, it could be useful as a component of a composite symptom score to guide referral decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Statistics. Cancer registration statistics, England 2002 — first release. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=915 (accessed 15 Aug 2006)
    1. Scottish Health Statistics. Scottish cancer registry data. http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/files/cancer_colorectal_inc_m.xls (accessed 15 Aug 2006)
    1. Mulcahy HE, O'Donoghue DP. Duration of colorectal cancer symptoms and survival: the effect of confounding clinical and pathological variables. Eur J Cancer. 1997;33(9):1461–1467. - PubMed
    1. Chaplin A, Curless R, Thomson R, Barton R. Prevalence of lower gastrointestinal symptoms and associated consultation behaviour in a British elderly population determined by face-to-face interview. Br J Gen Pract. 2000;50:798–802. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fijten GH, Muris JW, Starmans R, et al. The incidence and outcome of rectal bleeding in general practice. Fam Pract. 1993;10(3):283–287. - PubMed

Publication types