Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve
- PMID: 17008774
- DOI: 10.1159/000095966
Measuring the refractoriness of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve
Abstract
Intracochlear recordings in cochlear implant recipients provide access to the electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP). ECAP thresholds are potential predictors of speech processor map's threshold and comfortable loudness levels. The auditory nerve's refractory properties can influence these levels due to high-rate stimulation with interpulse intervals within the relative refractory period. Recovery functions were investigated at 84 stimulation sites in 14 Nucleus CI24 recipients using neural response telemetry and a modified forward masking technique. This technique introduces a reference masker-probe interval (MPI). In our study, an appropriate value between 300 and 375 micro s was determined for this reference MPI, and the use of a reference MPI of 300 micro s is suggested for recovery and amplitude growth functions. A median absolute refractory period of about 390 micro s and a median time constant of about 425 micro s were obtained by fitting an exponential model to the data. Hence, the auditory nerve is usually in relative refractory state when standard neural response telemetry forward masking is selected because of its default MPI of 500 micro s. This can bias the measurement of ECAP thresholds. Additionally, the shape of standard forward masking recovery functions was explained by the influence of latency shift of the neural response.
Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Similar articles
-
[Refractory behaviour of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve].HNO. 2008 Feb;56(2):131-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1660-3. HNO. 2008. PMID: 18273660 German.
-
Neural response telemetry reconsidered: II. The influence of neural population on the ECAP recovery function and refractoriness.Ear Hear. 2010 Jun;31(3):380-91. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181cb41aa. Ear Hear. 2010. PMID: 20090532
-
Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 1. Growth of loudness and ECAP amplitude with current.Hear Res. 2009 Jan;247(2):87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2008.11.003. Epub 2008 Nov 27. Hear Res. 2009. PMID: 19063956
-
Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation.J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Mar;131(3):2209-24. doi: 10.1121/1.3683248. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012. PMID: 22423717 Review.
-
Clinical uses of electrically evoked auditory nerve and brainstem responses.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;11(5):383-7. doi: 10.1097/00020840-200310000-00013. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003. PMID: 14502071 Review.
Cited by
-
A sound coding strategy based on a temporal masking model for cochlear implants.PLoS One. 2021 Jan 8;16(1):e0244433. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244433. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33417608 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Pulse Polarity on Thresholds and on Non-monotonic Loudness Growth in Cochlear Implant Users.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;18(3):513-527. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0614-4. Epub 2017 Jan 30. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28138791 Free PMC article.
-
Temporal response properties of the auditory nerve: data from human cochlear-implant recipients.Hear Res. 2012 Mar;285(1-2):46-57. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.01.010. Epub 2012 Feb 8. Hear Res. 2012. PMID: 22326590 Free PMC article.
-
[Refractory behaviour of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve].HNO. 2008 Feb;56(2):131-8. doi: 10.1007/s00106-007-1660-3. HNO. 2008. PMID: 18273660 German.
-
Forward Masking in Cochlear Implant Users: Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Data Using Pulse Train Maskers.J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017 Jun;18(3):495-512. doi: 10.1007/s10162-016-0613-5. Epub 2017 Feb 21. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017. PMID: 28224320 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical