Prognostic significance of postoperative morbidities in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking
- PMID: 17009146
- DOI: 10.1245/s10434-006-9125-6
Prognostic significance of postoperative morbidities in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking
Abstract
Background: To examine the prognostic significance of postoperative morbidities in patients with ovarian cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgical debulking.
Methods: Retrospective chart reviews of all patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking were performed from 1999 to 2002. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the distributions of important clinical variables. Logistic regression was used to identify statistically significant predictors of postoperative morbidities. Cox regression was used to model time to first clinical progression. Survivals were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log rank test. P < .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results: Fifty-eight patients were treated with neoadjuvant platinum-taxane combination chemotherapy. Major surgical complications were observed in four patients (6.8%). There were no perioperative deaths. The presence of concurrent medical comorbidities was associated with the development of significant postoperative morbidities (P = .038). Cox regression showed any macroscopic residual disease (P = .04) and the presence of significant postoperative morbidities (odds ratio, 4.7, 95% confidence interval, 1.8-12.7, P = .002) to be predictive of a shorter progression-free interval.
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval surgical debulking carried a low risk for postoperative morbidity. The adverse influence of marked postoperative morbidity on progression-free survival needs further study.
Similar articles
-
Tumor residual after surgical cytoreduction in prediction of clinical outcome in stage IV epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study.J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 1;26(1):83-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1953. Epub 2007 Nov 19. J Clin Oncol. 2008. PMID: 18025437
-
Prognostic factors for high-risk early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study.Cancer. 2008 May 15;112(10):2202-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23390. Cancer. 2008. PMID: 18348296 Clinical Trial.
-
The lack of significance of Ca125 response in epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and delayed primary surgical debulking.Gynecol Oncol. 2007 Jun;105(3):712-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.02.022. Epub 2007 Apr 2. Gynecol Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17400284
-
Primary surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.Eur J Cancer. 2011 Sep;47 Suppl 3:S88-92. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(11)70152-6. Eur J Cancer. 2011. PMID: 21944035 Review.
-
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2004 Aug;4(4):639-47. doi: 10.1586/14737140.4.4.639. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2004. PMID: 15270667 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of cardiovascular comorbidity on ovarian cancer mortality.Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Nov;22(11):2102-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0625. Epub 2013 Sep 17. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013. PMID: 24045927 Free PMC article.
-
Neoadjuvant treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: where do we stand and where are we going?Ann Transl Med. 2020 Dec;8(24):1710. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-1683. Ann Transl Med. 2020. PMID: 33490222 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical