Erection hardness: a unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
- PMID: 17011372
- DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.05.041
Erection hardness: a unifying factor for defining response in the treatment of erectile dysfunction
Abstract
The extensive sildenafil citrate erectile dysfunction (ED) database of double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials was examined to determine the relation between erection hardness graded on the Erectile Hardness Grading Scale (EHGS) and (1) erectile function (EF), as assessed by the EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF); (2) frequency of erections hard enough for penetration, as assessed by IIEF Q2; and (3) the percentage of successful sexual intercourse attempts according to patient event logs. Pooled data from 6549 men with ED provided strong proof and improved characterization of the response to sildenafil. Almost half of men with ED and a baseline IIEF EF domain score classified as "severe ED" (< or = 10) shifted to a score classified as "no ED" (> or = 26). Sildenafil recipients showed greater mean improvement from baseline to end point in IIEF Q2 scores versus placebo, regardless of baseline ED severity, and a higher mean percentage of successful sexual intercourse attempts occurred during the last 4 weeks of treatment versus placebo (5.4-fold vs 2.0-fold increase from baseline). At end point, 95% of men who scored "no ED" on the IIEF EF domain and 92% of men who reported "almost always/always" achieving an erection hard enough for penetration (IIEF Q2) had graded their erections hard (rigid) enough for penetration (grade 3) or completely hard and fully rigid (grade 4) during the last 4 weeks of treatment, suggesting that the IIEF EF domain and IIEF Q2 may be good surrogate end points for erection hardness. Furthermore, during the last 4 weeks of treatment, the percentage of grade 3 and/or 4 erections correlated positively with the percentage of successful sexual intercourse attempts. Hence, hard erections may be considered a unifying factor that defines response to ED treatment. Completely hard and fully rigid erections (grade 4) should be recognized as the optimal goal of an ED therapy. Evidence presented here demonstrates that sildenafil significantly improved EF as assessed by the IIEF EF domain and assessments of erection hardness in patients with ED; a dose-response relation was observed in the proportions of men with ED who graded their erections hard (rigid) enough for sexual penetration or completely hard and fully rigid.
Similar articles
-
Erectile function and assessments of erection hardness correlate positively with measures of emotional well-being, sexual satisfaction, and treatment satisfaction in men with erectile dysfunction treated with sildenafil citrate (Viagra).Urology. 2006 Sep;68(3 Suppl):26-37. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.06.027. Urology. 2006. PMID: 17011373 Review.
-
Sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction in men with diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from placebo-controlled trials.Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Nov;22(11):2111-20. doi: 10.1185/030079906X148256. Curr Med Res Opin. 2006. PMID: 17076971
-
Efficacy and safety of tadalafil in a Western European population of men with erectile dysfunction.BJU Int. 2004 Oct;94(6):871-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2004.05049.x. BJU Int. 2004. PMID: 15476525 Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized, double-blind, crossover trial of sildenafil in men with mild to moderate erectile dysfunction: efficacy at 8 and 12 hours postdose.Urology. 2008 Apr;71(4):686-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.025. Urology. 2008. PMID: 18387397 Clinical Trial.
-
Correlations between increased erection hardness and improvements in emotional well-being and satisfaction outcomes in men treated with sildenafil citrate for erectile dysfunction.Int J Impot Res. 2007 Jul-Aug;19(4):398-406. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3901549. Epub 2007 Mar 15. Int J Impot Res. 2007. PMID: 17361232 Review.
Cited by
-
Shear wave elastography as a new, non-invasive diagnostic modality for the diagnosis of penile elasticity: a prospective multicenter study.Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Apr 19;13:17562872211007978. doi: 10.1177/17562872211007978. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec. Ther Adv Urol. 2021. PMID: 33953801 Free PMC article.
-
Medical management of erectile dysfunction in aging males: is it too late to treat?Asian J Androl. 2014 Jan-Feb;16(1):153-6. doi: 10.4103/1008-682X.122580. Asian J Androl. 2014. PMID: 24369150 Free PMC article.
-
Peripheral atherosclerosis in patients with arterial erectile dysfunction.Int J Impot Res. 2014 Mar-Apr;26(2):55-60. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2013.35. Epub 2013 Oct 17. Int J Impot Res. 2014. PMID: 24132050
-
Erection hardness score or penile Doppler ultrasound: which is a better predictor of failure of nonsurgical treatment of erectile dysfunction?Sex Med. 2023 Mar 21;11(2):qfad009. doi: 10.1093/sexmed/qfad009. eCollection 2023 Apr. Sex Med. 2023. PMID: 36960301 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention and management of post prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.Transl Androl Urol. 2015 Aug;4(4):421-37. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2013.09.10. Transl Androl Urol. 2015. PMID: 26816841 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical