Real depth vs randot stereotests
- PMID: 17011876
- PMCID: PMC2777730
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2006.04.065
Real depth vs randot stereotests
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the performance of real depth and Randot stereotests in strabismic and nonstrabismic patients.
Design: Observational case series.
Methods: Stereoacuity was tested in 182 patients with a variety of strabismic conditions, using the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) distance stereotest, the near Frisby (nF) (both real depth tests), the Preschool Randot (nR), and Distance Randot (dR) tests (both based on Polaroid vectographs).
Results: Patients appreciated finer disparities with the nF test than the nR test at near and with the FD2 test than the dR test at distance.
Conclusions: The type of stereotest influences measurable thresholds, and the results from different tests are not interchangeable. The choice of test should depend on the question being asked; nF and FD2 would be appropriate for determining presence or absence of stereopsis and best measurable stereopsis. The more rigorous Randot tests would be appropriate for determining subtle changes.
References
-
- Frisby JP, Davis H, McMorrow K. An improved training procedure as a precursor to testing young children with the Frisby Stereotest. Eye. 1996;10:286–290. - PubMed
-
- Holmes JM, Fawcett SL. Testing distance stereoacuity with the Frisby-Davis 2 (FD2) test. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:193–195. - PubMed
-
- Birch E, Williams C, Hunter J, Lapa MC, ALSPAC “Children in Focus” Study Team Random dot stereoacuity of preschool children. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1997;34:217–222. - PubMed
-
- Fu VLN, Birch EE, Holmes JM. Assessment of New Distance Randot Test in Normal and Strabismic Patients. J AAPOS. 2006;10:419–423. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
