National and state standards in science and their potential influence on undergraduate science education

Affiliations

Comment

Jay B Labov. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2006 Fall.

. 2006 Fall;5(3):204-9.

doi: 10.1187/cbe.06-05-0162.

¹ Center for Education, National Research Council of the National Academies, Washington, DC 20001, USA. jlabov@nas.edu

No abstract available

Figures

Approaches to cell biology teaching: a primer on standards.
Tanner K, Allen D. Tanner K, et al. Cell Biol Educ. 2002 Winter;1(4):95-100. doi: 10.1187/cbe.02-09-0046. Cell Biol Educ. 2002. PMID: 12669094 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science . Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Washington, DC: 1993. [25 June 2006]. http://www.project2061.org/publications/bsl/online/bolintro.htm.
1. American Association for the Advancement of Science . Resources for Science Literacy: Professional Development. New York: Oxford University Press; 1997. [25 June 2006]. http://www.project2061.org/publications/rsl/online/index.htm.
1. American Association for the Advancement of Science . Atlas of Science Literacy. Washington, DC: 2001. [25 June 2006]. http://www.project2061.org/publications/atlas/default.htm.
1. Gross P. R., Goodenough U., Lerner L. S., Haack S., Schwartz M., Schwartz R., Finn C. E., Jr . The State of State Science Standards 2005. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation; 2005. [25 June 2006]. http://www.edexcellence.net/foundation/publication/publication.cfm?id=352.
1. International Technology Education Association . Standards for Technological Literacy. Reston, VA: 2000. [25 June 2006]. http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/Publications/STL/STLMainPage.htm.