Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2006 Oct;32(10):612-6.
doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.013334.

What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK

Affiliations

What do patients really want to know in an informed consent procedure? A questionnaire-based survey of patients in the Bath area, UK

H El-Wakeel et al. J Med Ethics. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Background: Medical decision making is based on patient autonomy and informed consent, which is an integral part of medical ethics, risk management and clinical governance. Consent to treatment has been extensively discussed, but the viewpoint of patients is not well represented. A new consent form was introduced by the Department of Health in 2001.

Aims: To determine the information most important to patients, to facilitate evidence-based guidelines and to provide a valid and reliable consent-procedure-satisfaction questionnaire.

Methods: An anonymous quantitative survey was carried out, asking 100 patients 15 questions regarding procedures they may need to undergo, using a Visual Analogue Scale to test the importance of each question.

Results and discussion: In total there were 77 respondents and the mean age was 48.8 (SD 17.63, range 20-82) years. There were 52% women and 48% men. Major complications, such as not undergoing the procedure, future management and long-term effect on work, all scored a median of 95%. Least concerns were related to technical details of the procedure and minor complications (median 64% and 63%, respectively). All other questions were still considered important (median 79-93%). No significant differences were observed between sex, age and professional groups, but a significant difference was observed between the education groups. Qualifications of the doctor did not correlate to any other question.

Conclusions: This questionnaire is proposed as a basis for informed consent guidelines to health workers and for measures of satisfaction with the consent procedure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None.

References

    1. Burrows R C, Hodgson R E. De facto gatekeeping and informed consent in intensive care. Med Law 19971617–27. - PubMed
    1. Dennis B P. The origin and nature of informed consent: experiences among vulnerable groups. J Prof Nurs 199915281–287. - PubMed
    1. Dalla‐Vorgia P, Lascaratos J, Skiadas P.et al Is consent in medicine a concept only of modern times? J Med Ethics 20012759–61. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bunch W H. Informed consent. Clin Orthop 200071–77. - PubMed
    1. Nelson‐Marten P, Rich B A. A historical perspective of informed consent in clinical practice and research. Semin Oncol Nurs 19991581–88. - PubMed