A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy
- PMID: 17013656
- PMCID: PMC2200707
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0225-6
A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of provocative tests of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy
Abstract
Clinical provocative tests of the neck, which position the neck and arm inorder to aggravate or relieve arm symptoms, are commonly used in clinical practice in patients with a suspected cervical radiculopathy. Their diagnostic accuracy, however, has never been examined in a systematic review. A comprehensive search was conducted in order to identify all possible studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria. A study was included if: (1) any provocative test of the neck for diagnosing cervical radiculopathy was identified; (2) any reference standard was used; (3) sensitivity and specificity were reported or could be (re-)calculated; and, (4) the publication was a full report. Two reviewers independently selected studies, and assessed methodological quality. Only six studies met the inclusion criteria, which evaluated five provocative tests. In general, Spurling's test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and high specificity, as did traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's maneuver. The upper limb tension test (ULTT) demonstrated high sensitivity and low specificity, while the shoulder abduction test demonstrated low to moderate sensitivity and moderate to high specificity. Common methodological flaws included lack of an optimal reference standard, disease progression bias, spectrum bias, and review bias. Limitations include few primary studies, substantial heterogeneity, and numerous methodological flaws among the studies; therefore, a meta-analysis was not conducted. This review suggests that, when consistent with the history and other physical findings, a positive Spurling's, traction/neck distraction, and Valsalva's might be indicative of a cervical radiculopathy, while a negative ULTT might be used to rule it out. However, the lack of evidence precludes any firm conclusions regarding their diagnostic value, especially when used in primary care. More high quality studies are necessary in order to resolve this issue.
Similar articles
-
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35593186 Free PMC article.
-
Value of physical tests in diagnosing cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review.Spine J. 2018 Jan;18(1):179-189. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.08.241. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28838857
-
Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jun;10(18):iii-iv, xi-259. doi: 10.3310/hta10180. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 16729917
-
Diagnostic Performance of Spurling's Test for the Assessment Subacute and Chronic Cervical Radiculopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025 Aug 1;104(8):717-723. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000002707. Epub 2025 Feb 4. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 39938056
-
Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography for detection of pulmonary hypertension in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 9;5(5):CD012809. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012809.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35532166 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
CHARACTERIZATION OF CERVICAL SPINE IMPAIRMENTS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS POST-CONCUSSION.Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019 Apr;14(2):282-295. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2019. PMID: 30997280 Free PMC article.
-
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic neck pain.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 12;12(12):CD011927. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011927.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31830313 Free PMC article.
-
Unnecessary Cervical Discectomy - A simple test to differentiate between Cervical and Shoulder Pathology: A Case Report.J Orthop Case Rep. 2022 Apr;12(4):31-34. doi: 10.13107/jocr.2022.v12.i04.2754. J Orthop Case Rep. 2022. PMID: 36380998 Free PMC article.
-
Use of post-isometric relaxation in the chiropractic management of a 55-year-old man with cervical radiculopathy.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012 Mar;56(1):9-17. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2012. PMID: 22457537 Free PMC article.
-
Nonoperative management of degenerative cervical radiculopathy: protocol of a systematic review.J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022 Apr;66(1):74-84. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2022. PMID: 35655692 Free PMC article.
References
-
- DJ Magee (ed) (1997) Cervical spine. In: Orthopedic physical assessment, 3rd edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 101–151
-
- R Evans (ed) (2001) Cervical spine. In: Illustrated orthopedic physical assessment, 2nd edn. C.V. Mosby, St. Louis
-
- AN de Wolf, JMA Mens (eds) (2001) De cervicale wervelkolom. In: Onderzoek van het bewegingsapparaat. Fysische diagnostiek in de algemene praktijk. Derde, Derde edn. Bohn, Stafleu, van Loghn, Houten/Diegem, The Netherlands, pp 137–156
-
- Abdulwahab SS, Sabbahi M. Neck retractions, cervical root decompression, and radicular pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000;30(1):4–9. - PubMed
-
- Ahlgren BD, Garfin SR. Cervical radiculopathy. Orthop Clin North Am. 1996;27(2):253–263. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous