Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):477-87.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00005.

Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial

Affiliations
Free article
Randomized Controlled Trial

Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial

Steven K Dobscha et al. Ann Intern Med. .
Free article

Abstract

Background: Intensive collaborative interventions improve depression outcomes, but the benefit of less intensive interventions is not clear.

Objective: To determine whether decision support improves outcomes for patients with depression.

Design: Clinician-level, cluster randomized, controlled trial.

Setting: 5 primary care clinics of 1 Veterans Affairs medical center.

Participants: 41 primary care clinicians, and 375 patients with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] depression scores of 10 to 25 or Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 [SCL-20] scores > or = 1.0).

Measurements: The primary outcome was change in depression score (SCL-20) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality-of-life (36-item Short Form for Veterans [SF-36V] score), patient satisfaction, antidepressant use, and health care utilization.

Intervention: Clinicians received depression education and were randomly assigned to depression decision support or usual care. The depression decision support team, which consisted of a psychiatrist and nurse, provided 1 early patient educational contact and depression monitoring with feedback to clinicians over 12 months.

Results: Although SCL-20 depression scores improved in both groups, the intervention had no effect compared with usual care. The difference in slopes comparing intervention and control over 12 months was 0.20 (95% CI, -0.37 to 0.78; P = 0.49), which was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Changes in SF-36V scores also did not differ between groups. At 12 months, intervention patients reported greater satisfaction (P = 0.002) and were more likely to have had at least 1 mental health specialty appointment (41.1% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.025), to have received any antidepressant (79.3% vs. 69.3%; P = 0.041), and to have received antidepressants for 90 days or more (76.2% vs. 61.6%; P = 0.008).

Limitations: Usual care clinicians received depression education and had on-site mental health support, which may have mitigated intervention effectiveness.

Conclusions: Decision support improved processes of care but not depression outcomes. More intensive care management or specialty treatment may be needed to improve depression outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Summary for patients in

Publication types