Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial
- PMID: 17015865
- DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00005
Depression decision support in primary care: a cluster randomized trial
Abstract
Background: Intensive collaborative interventions improve depression outcomes, but the benefit of less intensive interventions is not clear.
Objective: To determine whether decision support improves outcomes for patients with depression.
Design: Clinician-level, cluster randomized, controlled trial.
Setting: 5 primary care clinics of 1 Veterans Affairs medical center.
Participants: 41 primary care clinicians, and 375 patients with depression (Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] depression scores of 10 to 25 or Hopkins Symptom Checklist-20 [SCL-20] scores > or = 1.0).
Measurements: The primary outcome was change in depression score (SCL-20) at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality-of-life (36-item Short Form for Veterans [SF-36V] score), patient satisfaction, antidepressant use, and health care utilization.
Intervention: Clinicians received depression education and were randomly assigned to depression decision support or usual care. The depression decision support team, which consisted of a psychiatrist and nurse, provided 1 early patient educational contact and depression monitoring with feedback to clinicians over 12 months.
Results: Although SCL-20 depression scores improved in both groups, the intervention had no effect compared with usual care. The difference in slopes comparing intervention and control over 12 months was 0.20 (95% CI, -0.37 to 0.78; P = 0.49), which was neither clinically nor statistically significant. Changes in SF-36V scores also did not differ between groups. At 12 months, intervention patients reported greater satisfaction (P = 0.002) and were more likely to have had at least 1 mental health specialty appointment (41.1% vs. 27.2%; P = 0.025), to have received any antidepressant (79.3% vs. 69.3%; P = 0.041), and to have received antidepressants for 90 days or more (76.2% vs. 61.6%; P = 0.008).
Limitations: Usual care clinicians received depression education and had on-site mental health support, which may have mitigated intervention effectiveness.
Conclusions: Decision support improved processes of care but not depression outcomes. More intensive care management or specialty treatment may be needed to improve depression outcomes.
Comment in
-
Improving care for depression: there's no free lunch.Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):544-6. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00013. Ann Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17015873 No abstract available.
-
Decision support for primary care clinicians improves process of care but not symptoms in people with depression.Evid Based Ment Health. 2007 May;10(2):47. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.10.2.47. Evid Based Ment Health. 2007. PMID: 17459978 No abstract available.
Summary for patients in
-
Summaries for patients. Decision support in primary care and depression outcomes.Ann Intern Med. 2006 Oct 3;145(7):I10. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00003. Ann Intern Med. 2006. PMID: 17015861 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous