Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Oct;118(5):122e-133e.
doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000237094.58891.fb.

Current options in head and neck reconstruction

Affiliations
Review

Current options in head and neck reconstruction

Keith A Hurvitz et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Oct.

Abstract

Learning objectives: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand current trends in the treatment of head and neck cancer. 2. Discuss the challenges of reconstructing head and neck defects 3. Understand the different reconstructive options available for specific anatomical regions of the head and neck.

Background: Reconstructive surgery of the head and neck is both technically challenging and rewarding. In the past 20 years, significant advances in this field have improved surgical outcomes and patient function. The development and subsequent refinement of microvascular techniques, in particular, have been a major reason for this progression.

Methods: In this article, the authors review the current options available in head and neck reconstruction. Because a large number of major craniocervicofacial defects result from oncologic resection, the authors have focused their review on this particular subject. By dividing their discussion into different anatomical sites, the authors hope to cover all major aspects of this broad topic.

Results: Free tissue transfer has revolutionized head and neck reconstruction. The most widely used free flaps include the fibula, radial forearm, anterolateral thigh, and rectus abdominis. Restoration of both form and function is the ultimate goal.

Conclusions: Although defects of the head and neck region present a challenge, successful cosmetic and functional results have been achieved with both local and free tissue flaps. The flexibility of free tissue transfer, however, has dominated this area and continues to be the method of choice for reconstruction of sizable defects.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gurtner, G. C., and Evans, G. R. Advances in head and neck reconstruction. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 672, 2000.
    1. Thompson, J., Scolyer, R., and Kefford, R. Cutaneous melanoma. Lancet 365: 687, 2005.
    1. Blair, E. A., and Callender, D. L. Head and neck cancer: The problem. Clin. Plast. Surg. 21: 1, 1994.
    1. Silverberg, E., Boring, C. C., and Squires, T. S. Cancer statistics, 1990. CA Cancer J. Clin. 40: 9, 1990.
    1. Lang, P. G., Jr. The role of Mohs' micrographic surgery in the management of skin cancer and a perspective on the management of the surgical defect. Clin. Plast. Surg. 31: 5, 2004.