Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007 Feb;91(2):151-3.
doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.102277. Epub 2006 Oct 4.

Inferring myopia over the lifecourse from uncorrected distance visual acuity in childhood

Affiliations

Inferring myopia over the lifecourse from uncorrected distance visual acuity in childhood

Phillippa M Cumberland et al. Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Feb.

Abstract

Aim: To report the usefulness of uncorrected distance visual acuity (DVA) at 16 years to "screen" for myopia status and to assess the lifetime risk of myopia, based on a national birth cohort.

Methods: 1867 members of the 1958 British birth cohort for whom there were data on acuity at 16 years had autorefraction, as part of a biomedical survey, at 45 years. Reduced uncorrected DVA at age 16 years (6/12 or worse in both eyes) was compared with adult refraction (spherical equivalent).

Results: Only a quarter of individuals in the population studied who had developed myopia by 45 years of age had reduced acuity at 16 years of age. Notably, half of all adults with moderate myopia (-2.99 to -5.99) and 31% (11/35) with severe myopia (> or =-6) had good uncorrected DVA in both eyes at 16 years of age. Thus, sensitivities were low, ranging from 16% for all myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent -0.5) to 69% for severe myopia (cut-off point spherical equivalent -6). However, a high (91%) lifetime probability of primary myopia (spherical equivalent > or =-0.5) given a reduced uncorrected DVA at 16 years was found.

Conclusion: In this population, reduced uncorrected DVA in childhood is an inaccurate and inappropriate intermediate "phenotype" for capturing adult myopia status. However, our findings support assessment of DVA in secondary school children as an effective method of identifying refractive error (both myopia and hypermetropia).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morgan I, Rose K. How genetic is school myopia? Prog Retin Eye Res 2005241–38. - PubMed
    1. Kleinstein R N, Jones L A, Hullett S.et al Refractive error and ethnicity in children. Arch Ophthalmol 20031211141–1147. - PubMed
    1. Rose K, Smith W, Morgan I.et al The increasing prevalence of myopia: implications for Australia. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 200129116–120. - PubMed
    1. Hammond C J, Snieder H, Gilbert C E.et al Genes and the environment in refractive errors: The Twin Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001421232–1236. - PubMed
    1. Fredrick D R. Myopia. BMJ 20023241195–1199. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types