Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2006 Fall;4(4):194-8.
doi: 10.2310/7200.2006.023.

How to randomize

Affiliations
Review

How to randomize

Andrew J Vickers. J Soc Integr Oncol. 2006 Fall.

Abstract

Randomized trials are an important method for deciding whether integrative oncology therapies do more good than harm. Many investigators do not pay sufficient attention to randomization procedures, and several studies have shown that only a fraction of trial reports describe randomization adequately. The purpose of randomization is to prevent selection bias: randomization procedures must therefore ensure that researchers are unable to predict the group to which a patient will be randomized until the patient is unambiguously registered on study; moreover, researchers must be unable to change a patient's allocation after the patients are registered. The use of telephone randomization and opaque envelopes has been suggested as a good randomization method, but both can be subverted. Randomization should be conducted either by a pharmaceutical company, which sends blinded medication to the hospital pharmacy, or by a secure, password-protected database system. Computer randomization can easily incorporate extensions of randomization, such as blocking, stratification, and minimization, which can help ensure balance between groups.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pildal J, Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Forfang E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC. Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study. Bmj. 2005 May 7;330(7499):1049. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schulz KF. Subverting randomization in controlled trials. Jama. 1995 Nov 8;274(18):1456–8. - PubMed
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet. 2002 Feb 16;359(9306):614–8. - PubMed
    1. Doig GS, Simpson F. Randomization and allocation concealment: a practical guide for researchers. J Crit Care. 2005 Jun;20(2):187–91. discussion 91–3. - PubMed
    1. Kalish LA, Begg CB. The impact of treatment allocation procedures on nominal significance levels and bias. Control Clin Trials. 1987 Jun;8(2):121–35. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources